Table of Contents

Unveiling the Cognitive Tapestry: Psychological Profiles of Specific Learning Disorders

1. Introduction to Specific Learning Disorders (SLDs)

Specific Learning Disorders (SLDs) are a class of neurodevelopmental conditions that significantly impede an individual’s ability to acquire and utilize foundational academic skills. These disorders are typically identified during the early school years, though in some instances, they may not become fully apparent or diagnosed until adolescence or adulthood when academic or occupational demands increase.¹ The core feature of SLDs is a persistent difficulty in one or more of the cardinal areas of learning: reading, written expression, or mathematics.¹

1.1. Defining SLDs: Diagnostic Frameworks (DSM-5 & ICD-11)

The diagnostic landscape of learning disorders has evolved, with contemporary frameworks aiming for greater clarity and consistency. In 2013, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), published by the American Psychiatric Association, introduced a significant change by consolidating previously distinct learning disorders—namely reading disorder, mathematics disorder, and disorder of written expression—into a single, overarching diagnosis: Specific Learning Disorder (SLD).² This unified diagnosis acknowledges the frequent co-occurrence and shared underlying neurodevelopmental features among these difficulties.

According to the DSM-5, an SLD diagnosis requires the presence of difficulties in learning and using academic skills, as indicated by at least one of six specified symptoms that have persisted for a minimum of six months, despite the provision of targeted interventions.¹ These symptoms encompass challenges such as inaccurate or slow and effortful word reading, difficulty understanding the meaning of what is read, difficulties with spelling, difficulties with written expression (e.g., grammatical or punctuation errors, poor organization, lack of clarity), difficulties mastering number sense, number facts, or calculation, and difficulties with mathematical reasoning.⁴

The DSM-5 outlines four crucial diagnostic criteria (A-D) that must be met. Criterion A details the persistent academic skill difficulties. Criterion B stipulates that the affected academic skills must be substantially and quantifiably below those expected for the individual’s chronological age, causing significant interference with academic or occupational performance, or with activities of daily living; this is confirmed by individually administered standardized achievement measures and a comprehensive clinical assessment.⁴ For individuals aged 17 years and older, a documented history of impairing learning difficulties may substitute for standardized assessment.⁴ Criterion C specifies that the learning difficulties must begin during school-age years, even if they do not fully manifest until the demands for those skills exceed the individual’s limited capacities (e.g., timed tests, complex reports under deadline).² Finally, Criterion D underscores that the learning difficulties are not better accounted for by intellectual disabilities, uncorrected visual or auditory acuity, other mental or neurological disorders, psychosocial adversity, lack of proficiency in the language of academic instruction, or inadequate educational instruction.² The diagnosis is derived from a clinical synthesis of the individual’s developmental, medical, family, and educational history, school reports, and psychoeducational assessment.⁴

To further delineate the nature of the SLD, the DSM-5 employs specifiers to denote the primary area(s) of impairment:

With impairment in reading (commonly referred to as dyslexia).²
With impairment in written expression (commonly referred to as dysgraphia).²
With impairment in mathematics (commonly referred to as dyscalculia).² Additionally, the current severity of the disorder (Mild, Moderate, or Severe) is specified, reflecting the extent of difficulty and the level of support required.²

Concurrently, the International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision (ICD-11), developed by the World Health Organization, categorizes these conditions under “Developmental learning disorder” (coded as 6A03).⁶ This classification came into effect in January 2022.⁸ A Developmental learning disorder is characterized by significant and persistent difficulties in learning academic skills, which may include reading, writing, or arithmetic. The individual’s performance in the affected academic skill(s) is markedly below what would be expected for their chronological age and general level of intellectual functioning, resulting in significant impairment in academic or occupational functioning.⁷ The onset is typically during the early school years when academic skills are first taught.⁷

Similar to the DSM-5, the ICD-11 utilizes specifiers to denote the area of impairment:

Developmental learning disorder with impairment in reading (6A03.0).⁷
Developmental learning disorder with impairment in written expression (6A03.1).⁷
Developmental learning disorder with impairment in mathematics (6A03.2).⁷ The ICD-11 also includes “Developmental learning disorder with other specified impairment of learning” (6A03.3) and “Developmental learning disorder, unspecified” (6A03.Z).⁷ The exclusionary criteria in ICD-11 mirror those in DSM-5, stipulating that the disorder is not due to a disorder of intellectual development, sensory impairment (vision or hearing), neurological or motor disorder, lack of availability of education, lack of proficiency in the language of academic instruction, or psychosocial adversity.⁷

The term “learning disability” is frequently used, particularly within educational and legal systems (e.g., under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, IDEA, in the United States), and most individuals diagnosed with an SLD via DSM-5 criteria would also meet the criteria for a learning disability.¹ IDEA defines a specific learning disability as “a disorder in one or more of the basic psychological processes involved in understanding or in using language, spoken or written, which disorder may manifest itself in the imperfect ability to listen, think, speak, read, write, spell, or do mathematical calculations”.¹³

The convergence and divergence between these major diagnostic systems are noteworthy. While both DSM-5 and ICD-11 strive to capture similar neurodevelopmental challenges in academic learning, their structural organization and terminology exhibit subtle variations. For instance, DSM-5’s shift from separate disorders in DSM-IV to a single SLD diagnosis suggests a recognition of shared underlying mechanisms or frequent co-occurrence.² ICD-11’s “Developmental learning disorder” is conceptually aligned but remains a distinct classification.⁷ The use of specifiers for reading, writing, and mathematics in both systems, however, indicates a strong consensus on the core academic domains affected.² The stated aim of ICD-11 to harmonize with DSM-5 criteria ⁸ reflects a broader scientific effort towards achieving global consistency in diagnosis, which is paramount for coherent research and clinical practice. Nevertheless, the persistence of separate systems, despite harmonization efforts, implies that nuanced conceptual or practical distinctions remain, requiring careful navigation by clinicians and researchers.

A critical element in both diagnostic frameworks is the stringent application of exclusionary criteria.⁴ The stipulation that learning difficulties must not be better accounted for by other conditions (such as intellectual disability, sensory impairments, inadequate schooling, or psychosocial adversity) is fundamental. This principle firmly establishes the “specific” nature of SLDs, highlighting them as intrinsic to an individual’s learning processes rather than being secondary consequences of external factors or other overarching disabilities. This has profound implications for the assessment process, necessitating a comprehensive evaluation that considers a wide range of potential contributing factors to accurately differentiate SLDs.³ Such differentiation is vital, as the intervention for a reading difficulty stemming from uncorrected vision, for example, is fundamentally different from that required for dyslexia.

Table 1: Comparative Overview of DSM-5 and ICD-11 Diagnostic Criteria for Specific Learning Disorders

Feature	DSM-5 (American Psychiatric Association, 2013)	ICD-11 (World Health Organization, 2022)
Main Terminology	Specific Learning Disorder (SLD)	Developmental learning disorder (DLD)
Core Definition	Persistent difficulties learning and using academic skills (reading, writing, math) despite targeted interventions, with skills substantially below age expectation, causing significant interference.	Significant and persistent difficulties in learning academic skills (reading, writing, or arithmetic), with performance markedly below age and intellectual functioning, causing significant impairment.
Onset	During school-age years, though may not fully manifest until demands increase.	First manifests when academic skills are taught during early school years.
Specifiers for Impairment	– With impairment in reading (dyslexia) <br> – With impairment in written expression (dysgraphia) <br> – With impairment in mathematics (dyscalculia)	– With impairment in reading (synonyms include developmental dyslexia) <br> – With impairment in written expression (synonyms include dysgraphia) <br> – With impairment in mathematics (synonyms include developmental dyscalculia) <br> – With other specified impairment of learning <br> – Unspecified
Severity Levels	Mild, Moderate, Severe (based on difficulties and support needed).	Not explicitly detailed in the same tiered manner in provided snippets, but “markedly below” and “significant impairment” imply a threshold of severity.
Key Exclusionary Aspects	Not better accounted for by: intellectual disabilities, uncorrected sensory acuity, other mental/neurological disorders, psychosocial adversity, lack of language proficiency, inadequate instruction.	Not due to: disorder of intellectual development, sensory impairment, neurological/motor disorder, lack of education, lack of language proficiency, psychosocial adversity.
Diagnostic Basis	Clinical synthesis of history, school reports, and psychoeducational assessment.	Individual’s performance markedly below expected; significant impairment in academic/occupational functioning.

1.2. Core Conceptual Tenets: Specificity and Unexpectedness in SLDs

Two foundational concepts, “specificity” and “unexpectedness,” have traditionally been central to the characterization and diagnosis of SLDs, particularly dyslexia.¹⁵ “Specificity” posits that the observed difficulties, for example, in reading and spelling in the case of dyslexia, are not accompanied by significant deficits in other academic domains or general cognitive functioning.¹⁵ This tenet is crucial for distinguishing SLDs from more global learning difficulties, such as those associated with intellectual disability. It underscores that the primary impairment is localized to particular academic skills and their underlying cognitive processes. This specificity is reinforced by the exclusionary criteria present in both DSM-5 and ICD-11, which rule out broader cognitive impairments as the primary cause.⁴ The diagnostic process therefore aims to identify the precise domain(s) of impairment—reading, written expression, or mathematics—which in turn guides the development of targeted interventions.⁴ Understanding this specificity also aids in recognizing that individuals with SLDs often possess notable strengths in other areas of functioning.¹⁶

“Unexpectedness” refers to the idea that individuals with SLDs exhibit significant learning difficulties that cannot be fully explained by their overall intelligence or by environmental factors such as inadequate instruction or socioeconomic disadvantage.⁵ In essence, other aspects of their development appear to be progressing typically.⁵ These concepts have been integral to the definition of dyslexia and other SLDs since their earliest descriptions in the late 19th century and continue to inform diagnostic practice.¹⁵

Historically, the “unexpectedness” criterion was often operationalized through an “IQ-achievement discrepancy model,” which required a statistically significant difference between an individual’s measured intelligence (IQ) and their academic achievement in the affected area.⁵ However, this model has faced criticism for several reasons, including its tendency to delay diagnosis until a significant gap emerged (the “wait-to-fail” approach) and its potential to exclude students with lower IQs who still demonstrated specific, unexpected learning deficits.⁵ Consequently, current diagnostic guidelines, including those in the DSM-5 and IDEA, no longer mandate a severe IQ-discrepancy.⁵ Instead, the operationalization of “unexpectedness” has evolved towards a more comprehensive clinical synthesis.⁴ This approach considers persistent difficulties despite the provision of evidence-based interventions, and academic skills that are substantially below what is expected for the individual’s chronological age, confirmed through standardized measures and thorough clinical assessment.⁴ This shift reflects a more nuanced understanding, where “unexpectedness” is gauged by the failure to acquire academic skills at an anticipated rate and level, given appropriate educational opportunities and overall cognitive functioning, rather than solely by a mathematical discrepancy with an IQ score. This evolution has significant implications for facilitating earlier identification and intervention.

2. The Psychological Profile of Dyslexia (Impairment in Reading)

Dyslexia, formally specified as Specific Learning Disorder with impairment in reading, is the most widely researched SLD. It is characterized by primary difficulties in accurate and/or fluent word recognition, poor spelling, and decoding abilities.¹³ These difficulties typically result from a deficit in the phonological component of language that is often unexpected in relation to other cognitive abilities and the provision of effective classroom instruction.⁵

2.1. Core Cognitive Correlates: Phonological Deficits, Working Memory, and Processing Speed

The cognitive underpinnings of dyslexia are multifaceted, but a predominant finding across extensive research points to a core deficit in phonological processing.² This refers to the ability to perceive, manipulate, and use the sound structure of language. Difficulties in this domain can manifest in several ways:

Phonological Awareness: Challenges in recognizing and manipulating the sounds within spoken words, such as breaking words down into syllables (e.g., “cat-er-pil-lar”), recognizing rhyming words (e.g., cat, hat, bat), or identifying individual phonemes (e.g., the /k/ sound in “cat”).² These difficulties can be apparent even before a child begins formal reading instruction.²
Phonological Memory (Working Memory for Sounds): A reduced capacity to hold sound-based information in short-term memory. This impacts tasks like repeating back unfamiliar multi-syllabic words or remembering sequences of sounds, which is crucial for learning new words and for decoding.¹⁶
Phonological Processing Speed (Rapid Naming): Slowness in retrieving the phonological codes (sound names) for familiar visual stimuli like letters, numbers, colors, or objects, a skill often assessed by Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN) tasks.¹⁶

This centrality of the phonological deficit is strongly supported by numerous studies, suggesting it as a primary causal factor in the difficulties experienced with decoding written text.² The struggle to connect graphemes (letters or letter patterns) with their corresponding phonemes (sounds) directly impedes the ability to “sound out” or decode unfamiliar words.²

While phonological deficits are primary, they often interact with and are exacerbated by weaknesses in other cognitive domains. Working memory capacity, more generally, is frequently implicated in dyslexia.¹⁶ The process of reading requires holding and manipulating segments of text, meanings of words, and overall sentence structure simultaneously. If working memory is constrained, this complex task becomes even more arduous. Similarly, processing speed, beyond just phonological retrieval, can be slower in individuals with dyslexia.¹⁶ This can affect the rate at which visual information is processed and integrated with linguistic information during reading. Difficulties in orthographic skills—the ability to form, store, and recall the visual representations of letters and words—also contribute to the dyslexic profile.¹⁶ The interplay of these cognitive deficits means that interventions may need to be multifaceted, addressing not only phonological skills but also related cognitive support mechanisms for optimal outcomes.

2.2. Academic Footprint: Challenges in Reading Accuracy, Fluency, Comprehension, and Spelling

The cognitive characteristics of dyslexia translate into a distinct pattern of academic challenges:

Word Reading Accuracy: Individuals with dyslexia often exhibit inaccurate word reading. This can involve misreading single words, frequently guessing at words based on initial letters or context, and significant difficulty in accurately sounding out unfamiliar words.²
Reading Rate or Fluency: Reading is typically slow, labored, and effortful, lacking the automaticity and smoothness seen in proficient readers.² Even if words are eventually decoded correctly, the process consumes considerable time and cognitive resources.¹³
Reading Comprehension: Understanding the meaning of written text is often compromised.² This can occur even if individual words are read with relative accuracy.⁴ Difficulties may lie in understanding sequences of events, relationships between ideas, making inferences, or grasping deeper, non-literal meanings.⁴ The intense cognitive effort required for decoding often leaves fewer resources available for these higher-level comprehension processes.²⁹ This “fluency-comprehension cascade” explains why listening comprehension is frequently a relative strength for individuals with dyslexia, as it bypasses the decoding bottleneck.¹⁷
Spelling (Encoding): Difficulties with spelling are a hallmark of dyslexia and are often among the most persistent challenges, even when reading skills improve.² Spelling requires accurate phonological analysis, knowledge of orthographic patterns (letter-sound rules and common letter strings), and robust memory for word forms. The profound and lasting nature of spelling difficulties suggests that dyslexia impacts not only the intake of written language (reading) but also its output and the underlying mental representation of word structures.
Written Expression: Beyond spelling, some individuals with dyslexia may also show difficulties with the accuracy of their written work more broadly.²
Avoidance of Reading-Related Activities: As a consequence of these persistent struggles, many adolescents and adults with dyslexia develop an aversion to activities that involve reading, such as reading for pleasure or tackling lengthy instructional texts.² They may gravitate towards information presented in other media, such as pictures, videos, or audio formats.²

2.3. Information Processing Characteristics: Decoding, Orthographic Mapping, and Sequential Processing

The difficulties in academic skills are rooted in specific information processing characteristics:

Decoding: At the heart of dyslexia is a deficit in decoding—the process of translating printed words into sounds or identifying words based on their letter patterns.² This involves difficulty in breaking words into their constituent sounds (phonemic awareness) and in associating letters or letter combinations with those sounds (phonics).²⁸
Orthographic Mapping: This refers to the mental process used to store written words in long-term memory for instant, effortless retrieval. It involves forming connections between the phonological structure of a word (its sounds), its orthographic structure (its letter sequence), and its meaning. Individuals with dyslexia often struggle with this process, which is why they may need many exposures to a word before recognizing it automatically, if at all.²³
Sequential Processing: Dyslexia is frequently associated with difficulties in processing and remembering information in a specific sequence.¹⁶ This impacts reading, where the order of letters within a word is critical, and spelling, which requires recalling letters in their correct sequence. Studies have shown that individuals with dyslexia may perform poorly on tasks involving visual sequential memory and auditory sequential memory.³⁶ This difficulty can extend beyond literacy tasks to remembering the order of the alphabet, days of the week, months of the year, or even sequences of motor actions like tying shoelaces or steps in long division.¹⁷ This suggests a more fundamental cognitive challenge in processing ordered information, which has wide-ranging implications and may contribute to the overlap with other SLDs or executive function weaknesses. The collective impact of deficits in decoding, orthographic mapping, and sequential processing is a significant impediment to developing automatic word recognition, the cornerstone of fluent reading.
Visual Processing: While dyslexia is primarily understood as a language-based disorder, some individuals may exhibit difficulties with certain visual aspects of reading, such as confusing letters with similar shapes (e.g., ‘b’ and ‘d’, ‘p’ and ‘q’).¹⁷ However, it is important to distinguish these from primary visual acuity problems or conditions like “visual stress” (sometimes referred to as Meares-Irlen Syndrome), which can co-occur with dyslexia but are considered distinct entities.³⁵ Some research also indicates that individuals with dyslexia might process visual information differently, which in some specific contexts could even lead to relative strengths in certain visuospatial tasks.²⁶

2.4. Cognitive Landscape: Patterns of Strengths (e.g., Visuospatial Reasoning, Creativity) and Weaknesses

A crucial aspect of the psychological profile of dyslexia is the often-observed pattern of specific weaknesses in literacy-related areas coexisting with average or even superior abilities in other cognitive domains. This “spiky profile” is a defining feature and moves the understanding of dyslexia beyond a purely deficit-based model.²³

Commonly Reported Strengths:

Reasoning and Problem-Solving: Many individuals with dyslexia demonstrate strong abilities in logical reasoning, critical thinking, and problem-solving.¹⁶ They may excel at understanding complex concepts and “getting the gist” of things.¹⁷
Visuospatial Skills: Strengths in visuospatial processing are frequently noted. This can manifest as talent in areas like solving puzzles, building models, understanding spatial relationships (e.g., in sports), or in visual arts and design.¹⁶ Some research even suggests potential advantages in specific visuospatial tasks, such as processing geometric figures or mental rotation, possibly reflecting different neural processing strategies or compensatory development.²⁶
Creativity and Imagination: A heightened capacity for creative thinking, imagination, and “out-of-the-box” ideation is often associated with dyslexia.²
Conceptualization and “Big Picture” Thinking: Individuals may excel at understanding overarching concepts, abstract ideas, and seeing the broader context or “big picture”.¹⁷
Oral Language Skills: Despite difficulties with written language, many individuals with dyslexia possess strong oral vocabularies and excellent listening comprehension skills.¹⁷ Their ability to understand spoken language is often significantly better than their ability to comprehend written text.
Empathy and Interpersonal Skills: Enhanced empathy, warmth, and emotional intelligence have also been reported as potential strengths.¹⁷

Key Weaknesses (beyond core literacy):

Phonological processing (as detailed in 2.1).²
Working memory (particularly verbal working memory).¹⁶
Processing speed, including Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN).¹⁶
Sequential memory and processing.¹⁷
Difficulty learning a foreign language, which often heavily relies on phonological skills and explicit grammar learning.¹⁷
Sometimes, organizational skills and time management can be challenging, potentially linked to underlying executive function weaknesses or the cognitive load imposed by academic tasks.¹⁶

The “Sea of Strengths” model, proposed by Dr. Sally Shaywitz, aptly describes this profile: an “island of weakness” in decoding surrounded by a “sea of strengths” in higher-level thinking and reasoning.²³ Recognizing and nurturing these strengths is vital for the individual’s self-esteem, for developing effective compensatory strategies, and for guiding educational and career pathways.¹⁷ The presence of these strengths alongside specific weaknesses also helps fulfill the “unexpectedness” criterion in diagnosis. The observation of visuospatial strengths, sometimes even advantages ²⁶, raises intriguing questions about underlying neural organization in dyslexia. It is plausible that the brain pathways for visual and spatial processing might be more developed or utilized differently, perhaps as a compensatory mechanism for less efficient language-based pathways, or due to inherent differences in neural architecture from an early age.²⁶

2.5. Associated Executive Function Deficits

Executive functions (EFs) are a set of higher-order cognitive processes that control and regulate other cognitive abilities and behaviors. They are essential for goal-directed activity and include skills such as planning, organization, working memory, task initiation, sustained attention, cognitive flexibility, emotional control, and metacognition (self-monitoring).³⁸ Individuals with dyslexia often exhibit weaknesses in several of these EF domains, which can co-occur with or be exacerbated by their primary literacy difficulties.⁵

Working Memory: As previously noted, this is a well-established area of difficulty in dyslexia and is itself a core executive function.¹⁶
Planning and Prioritization: Difficulties may arise in planning multi-step tasks, such as long-term projects, or in prioritizing aspects of an assignment.³⁹
Organization: Challenges with organizing materials (e.g., messy notebooks, lost papers), thoughts for writing, or study schedules are common.¹⁶
Task Initiation: Procrastination or difficulty starting tasks, particularly those perceived as challenging like reading or writing assignments, can be an issue.³⁸
Sustained Attention: While distinct from the pervasive attention deficits seen in ADHD, individuals with dyslexia may struggle to sustain attention during demanding literacy tasks due to the high cognitive effort required.³⁸
Time Management: Difficulties in estimating how long tasks will take and in meeting deadlines are frequently reported.³⁸
Cognitive Flexibility: Some individuals may find it hard to shift between different strategies or adapt their approach when facing obstacles in reading or writing tasks.³⁸
Metacognition: Challenges in self-monitoring reading comprehension, evaluating the effectiveness of learning strategies, or understanding how their learning process differs can occur.³⁸

These EF weaknesses can significantly compound the primary challenges of dyslexia. For example, poor organizational skills can make managing voluminous reading assignments and notes even more difficult for a student who already reads slowly and laboriously. Weak task initiation can lead to further avoidance of literacy-based activities, reducing opportunities for practice and improvement. The cognitive load imposed by the effortful nature of reading and writing for individuals with dyslexia can also tax their available EF resources, making it harder to engage in effective planning, monitoring, and regulation of their learning.

It is important to differentiate EF challenges associated with dyslexia from those seen in ADHD, although the two conditions frequently co-occur.⁴⁰ In dyslexia without comorbid ADHD, EF difficulties may be more pronounced in, or specifically triggered by, literacy-related tasks and the cognitive demands they impose.⁴⁰ In contrast, EF deficits in ADHD tend to be more pervasive across various situations. This distinction highlights the necessity of comprehensive assessment to disentangle primary EF deficits from those that are secondary to, or exacerbated by, the struggles inherent in dyslexia. Addressing these EF weaknesses through targeted strategies and support is often a crucial component of effective dyslexia intervention.

3. The Psychological Profile of Dysgraphia (Impairment in Written Expression)

Dysgraphia, specified in the DSM-5 as Specific Learning Disorder with impairment in written expression, is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by significant and persistent difficulties with the acquisition and execution of writing skills.¹ These difficulties are unexpected given the individual’s chronological age, measured intelligence, and age-appropriate educational opportunities.¹⁸ Dysgraphia can affect writing ability at any stage, from the physical act of forming letters to the complex organization of ideas into coherent text.¹⁸

3.1. Core Cognitive Correlates: Fine-Motor Skills, Orthographic Processing, and Language Output

Dysgraphia is not a unitary disorder but rather a multifaceted construct that can stem from a variety of underlying cognitive and motor deficits. These can broadly be categorized as:

Fine Motor Skill Deficits (Motor-based Dysgraphia): Many individuals with dysgraphia experience primary difficulties with the mechanical aspects of writing.¹⁸ This can manifest as:

Poor or awkward pencil grip.¹⁸
Difficulty with letter formation, resulting in illegible or inconsistently formed characters.⁴³
Slow and laborious handwriting.¹⁸
Pain or fatigue during writing.¹⁸ This type of dysgraphia is sometimes referred to as motor dysgraphia or peripheral dysgraphia.¹⁸

Orthographic Coding and Processing Deficits: This involves difficulty in forming, storing, and retrieving the visual images of letters and words (orthographic representations) and the sequence of motor movements required to write them.¹⁹ Orthographic coding is a crucial aspect of working memory that enables the permanent storage of written words and the motor plans for their production.¹⁹ Deficits in this area directly impact spelling accuracy and the fluency of writing, as the individual struggles to automatically recall and produce correct letter sequences.
Language Processing and Output Deficits (Language-based/Linguistic Dysgraphia): Some individuals with dysgraphia struggle primarily with translating their thoughts and ideas into written language, even if their fine motor skills for handwriting are relatively intact.¹⁸ These difficulties can include:

Problems with grammar, syntax, and punctuation.¹
Poor organization of ideas and lack of clarity in written expression.²
Difficulties with word retrieval specifically for writing.⁵⁶ This is sometimes termed language-based dysgraphia or linguistic dysgraphia.¹⁸
Visual-Spatial Processing Deficits (Spatial Dysgraphia): Difficulties in perceiving and manipulating spatial relationships can also contribute to dysgraphia.¹⁸ This can manifest as:

Inconsistent letter size and spacing between letters and words.¹⁸
Difficulty writing in a straight line or staying within margins.⁴³
Poor spatial organization of text on the page.⁴⁷ This is sometimes referred to as spatial dysgraphia.⁴⁵

The multifaceted nature of dysgraphia means that its presentation can vary considerably among individuals. One person might exhibit primarily illegible handwriting due to motor control issues, while another might produce legible script that is, however, disorganized and riddled with grammatical errors due to underlying linguistic or executive function deficits. Some conceptualizations also include “dyslexic dysgraphia,” where individuals struggle to write words spontaneously (especially with spelling) but may be able to copy text relatively well and have adequate fine motor speed for non-writing tasks.⁵² This highlights the overlap that can exist with dyslexia. The critical role of orthographic coding ¹⁹ serves as a bridge between the motor act of writing and the linguistic content, as it is essential for fluent spelling and the retrieval of visual word forms necessary for writing.

3.2. Academic Footprint: Difficulties in Spelling, Grammar, Punctuation, and Written Composition

The cognitive and motor challenges associated with dysgraphia have a direct and often significant impact on academic performance, particularly in tasks requiring written output.

Spelling Accuracy: Impaired spelling is a very common and often prominent feature of dysgraphia.¹ This can stem from phonological processing weaknesses (similar to dyslexia), poor orthographic memory, or difficulties segmenting words into sounds for encoding.
Grammar and Punctuation Accuracy: Written work by individuals with dysgraphia frequently contains multiple errors in grammar (e.g., incorrect verb tense, subject-verb agreement issues, incorrect pronoun usage) and punctuation.¹ They may omit words from sentences or struggle with correct word order.⁴³
Clarity and Organization of Written Expression: A hallmark difficulty is producing written text that is clear, coherent, and well-organized.¹ This can involve poor paragraph structure, a lack of logical flow between ideas, and a general inability to express thoughts effectively on paper, even if the ideas themselves are sound.¹⁸
Handwriting Quality (Graphomotor Aspects): As noted, handwriting is often problematic, characterized by illegibility, slowness, messiness, inconsistent letter formation (e.g., mixing print and cursive, irregular sizing), and poor spacing.¹⁸
Rate of Writing: The speed of writing is typically slow and laborious.¹⁸ This makes it difficult to complete written assignments within time limits and to take notes effectively in class.
Avoidance of Writing Tasks: Due to the effort and frustration involved, individuals with dysgraphia may develop an aversion to writing and try to avoid writing tasks whenever possible.¹⁸

A key diagnostic indicator, particularly for language-based dysgraphia, is a noticeable discrepancy between an individual’s verbal expressive abilities and their written output.² They may be articulate and able to convey complex ideas when speaking, but their written work fails to reflect this level of understanding or linguistic competence. This is crucial for educators to recognize, as it indicates that the difficulty lies with the modality of written expression rather than a lack of knowledge or general cognitive ability. Furthermore, even if higher-level ideation is intact, the significant effort required for the lower-level mechanics of writing (such as spelling, handwriting, and basic grammar) can create an “effortful bottleneck”.⁴⁵ This consumes cognitive resources that would otherwise be available for more complex thought processes like organizing arguments or elaborating on ideas, leading to written work that may appear simplistic or poorly developed despite the writer’s underlying capabilities.⁴⁴

3.3. Information Processing Characteristics: Translating Thoughts to Text, Idea Generation, and Organization

The academic challenges seen in dysgraphia are underpinned by specific difficulties in information processing related to written language:

Translating Thoughts to Text: The fundamental difficulty lies in the complex process of converting internal thoughts, ideas, and oral language into a written symbolic form.¹ This suggests a breakdown in the bridge between internal language or ideation and its external written representation, particularly evident in language-based dysgraphia.
Idea Generation, Planning, and Organization: Individuals with dysgraphia often struggle with the higher-level cognitive processes involved in planning and organizing their writing.² This includes generating ideas, sequencing them logically, structuring paragraphs, and maintaining coherence throughout a piece of writing.¹⁸
Working Memory: Effective writing places heavy demands on working memory. It is needed to hold and manipulate ideas, retrieve vocabulary, maintain sentence structure, remember spelling and grammatical rules, and monitor the writing process simultaneously.⁴³ Deficits in working memory can therefore significantly impair writing ability. For instance, to spell correctly, one needs to hold sound-letter correspondences and orthographic word representations in mind.⁴⁴
Phonological Processing: Similar to dyslexia, deficits in phonological processing (manipulating the sounds of language) can contribute to spelling difficulties in dysgraphia, as spelling relies on translating sounds into their corresponding letter patterns.⁴⁸
Auditory and Visual Processing: Some research suggests that students with dysgraphia may also have underlying deficits in auditory processing (interpreting what they hear) and visual processing (interpreting what they see), which are distinct from sensory acuity problems.⁴⁸ For example, visual processing issues can affect the perception of letter shapes or spatial arrangement on the page.
Sequential Processing: Difficulties in sequencing are also apparent. This can affect the ordering of letters within words, words within sentences, and the logical flow of ideas in a larger text.⁴⁷ Language-based dysgraphia, in particular, is noted for delays in processing and sequencing ideas for writing.¹⁸

Dysgraphia underscores the immense cognitive load inherent in the act of writing. The task requires the simultaneous coordination of multiple processes: fine motor execution, orthographic recall, lexical access, grammatical structuring, idea organization, and self-monitoring.⁴³ A weakness in any of these underlying processes can disrupt the entire system, leading to writing that is slow, laborious, error-prone, and ultimately, an inadequate reflection of the individual’s knowledge or intellectual capacity.⁴³ The analogy of taking “windy back roads” instead of a “wide-open highway” effectively illustrates the increased cognitive effort and time involved for individuals with dysgraphia.⁴⁸

3.4. Cognitive Landscape: Patterns of Strengths (e.g., Verbal Expression) and Weaknesses

Despite the significant challenges in written expression, individuals with dysgraphia often possess a range of cognitive strengths, particularly in non-written domains. Recognizing this pattern is crucial for a balanced understanding and for fostering self-esteem.

Commonly Reported Strengths:

Verbal Expression and Oral Skills: A frequently observed strength is good, sometimes even superior, oral communication ability. This includes strong oral storytelling skills, articulate verbal expression, and good listening comprehension.² The discrepancy between high oral language abilities and poor written output is often a key diagnostic indicator.⁵⁵
Memory and Recall: Some individuals with dysgraphia may exhibit strong abilities in memorizing and recalling details, particularly information received orally.¹⁸
Interpersonal and Leadership Skills: Good interpersonal skills and natural leadership qualities have been noted as potential strengths.¹⁸ They may be adept at reading situations and convincing others.¹⁹
Problem-Solving and Big-Picture Thinking: The need to navigate a world that heavily relies on writing may foster creative problem-solving skills and an ability to see the “big picture”.¹⁹
General Intelligence: Dysgraphia, like other SLDs, is not related to overall intelligence, and individuals often have average or above-average IQs.⁴⁴

Key Weaknesses (beyond core writing mechanics):

Fine motor coordination and control.¹⁸
Orthographic coding and memory for written words.¹⁹
Visual-spatial processing, particularly related to the organization of written material on a page.¹⁹
Phonological processing (contributing to spelling issues).⁴⁸
Auditory processing (in some subtypes like auditory dysgraphia).¹⁹
Working memory, especially for tasks involving language and motor output.⁴⁴
Executive functions, including planning, organization, and task initiation related to writing.⁴³

The paradox of strong verbal skills coexisting with poor written output is a common and defining pattern in many cases of dysgraphia, particularly the language-based subtype.¹⁸ This discrepancy is a critical diagnostic clue and a significant source of frustration for the individual. It underscores that dysgraphia is not an impairment of overall language ability or intellect but a specific difficulty with the output modality of writing. Leveraging these verbal strengths, for example, through the use of speech-to-text technology or allowing for oral responses, becomes an essential compensatory strategy.⁴⁸ Furthermore, strengths in areas like problem-solving, leadership, and good oral memory can be harnessed to help individuals navigate the academic and occupational challenges posed by dysgraphia, contributing to self-esteem and guiding them toward suitable career paths that play to these assets.

3.5. Associated Executive Function Deficits

The act of writing is profoundly dependent on a suite of executive functions (EFs) that orchestrate the complex interplay of cognitive, linguistic, and motor processes.⁴³ Difficulties in written expression, as seen in dysgraphia, are therefore often intertwined with or exacerbated by weaknesses in these EFs.

Planning and Organization: Essential for structuring written work, from outlining ideas to organizing paragraphs and ensuring logical flow. Deficits in planning and organization are a core component of the “clarity or organization of written expression” impairment noted in DSM-5 criteria for SLD with impairment in written expression.⁴ Individuals may struggle to create a coherent plan before writing or to organize their thoughts effectively as they write.
Task Initiation: The ability to begin a writing task without undue procrastination can be challenging, especially when writing is perceived as difficult or unrewarding.⁶⁵
Working Memory: Writing demands significant working memory capacity to simultaneously generate ideas, retrieve vocabulary, formulate sentences, hold spelling and grammar rules in mind, and monitor the emerging text.⁴³ Weaknesses here can lead to fragmented writing or loss of intended meaning.
Self-Monitoring and Evaluation: The ability to review one’s own writing for errors in mechanics, clarity, and organization, and to make necessary revisions, is a critical EF. Individuals with dysgraphia may struggle with this self-monitoring process.⁵⁵
Sustained Attention: Maintaining focus and concentration throughout the often lengthy and demanding process of writing can be difficult, particularly if the task is frustrating.⁶⁵
Cognitive Flexibility: Adapting writing plans, shifting between different aspects of the writing process (e.g., drafting to editing), or trying new approaches when one is not working effectively requires cognitive flexibility, which may be an area of weakness.⁶⁵
Emotional Regulation: Managing the frustration, anxiety, or discouragement that can arise from writing difficulties is an important aspect of self-regulation that impacts persistence and effort.⁶⁵

Executive functions act as the “conductor” of the writing “orchestra,” coordinating the multiple cognitive and motor components involved. Weaknesses in these EFs can lead to a disorganized, inefficient, and ultimately less effective writing process, even if some individual component skills (like basic vocabulary or understanding of some grammar rules) are relatively intact. This explains why some individuals with dysgraphia might possess good ideas but produce written work that is poorly structured or difficult to follow.⁴

There is often a bidirectional relationship between EF deficits and writing difficulties. Pre-existing EF weaknesses can certainly cause or contribute to problems in written expression. Conversely, the persistent struggle and frustration associated with dysgraphia (e.g., with handwriting or spelling) can heavily tax available EF resources, such as working memory and attention, leaving fewer cognitive resources for higher-level planning, organization, and revision.⁴⁵ This can create a negative cycle where EF weaknesses and writing difficulties mutually reinforce each other, leading to task avoidance (an EF issue of task initiation) and emotional distress ⁴⁴, which can further impair executive functioning. This interplay highlights the necessity for interventions that address both the specific writing skill deficits and the associated executive function challenges.

4. The Psychological Profile of Dyscalculia (Impairment in Mathematics)

Dyscalculia, specified in the DSM-5 as Specific Learning Disorder with impairment in mathematics, is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by significant and persistent difficulties in learning and performing mathematical skills.¹ These difficulties are not attributable to intellectual disability, inadequate schooling, or sensory impairments, and they manifest despite average or above-average intelligence in other areas.²⁰

4.1. Core Cognitive Correlates: Number Sense, Magnitude Representation, and Mathematical Working Memory

At the heart of dyscalculia lie fundamental deficits in the cognitive processes that support mathematical understanding and performance.

Number Sense: A core impairment in dyscalculia is a poorly developed “number sense”.¹ This refers to an intuitive understanding of numbers, their magnitude, their relationships to one another, and how they are affected by operations. Difficulties in mastering number sense are a key diagnostic criterion in the DSM-5.¹ This can include a poor grasp of basic numerical concepts, such as quantity, and difficulty with subitizing—the ability to rapidly and accurately perceive the quantity of a small set of items without counting.⁶⁸ This fundamental deficit in intuitively understanding and representing numbers is akin to the phonological deficit in dyslexia; it represents a weak foundational building block upon which later mathematical skills are constructed.
Magnitude Representation: Closely related to number sense is the concept of magnitude representation, which involves the mental representation of numerical quantities and the ability to compare them (e.g., understanding that 8 is greater than 7).⁶⁸ The “Approximate Number System” (ANS) hypothesis suggests an innate system for estimating and comparing quantities, which may be less precise or accessible in individuals with dyscalculia.⁶⁸ Difficulties in comparing magnitudes, both symbolic (Arabic numerals) and non-symbolic (e.g., sets of dots), are often observed.⁶⁸
Working Memory for Mathematical Information: Deficits in working memory, particularly for numerical and visuospatial information, are commonly associated with dyscalculia [⁶⁸ (visuospatial sketchpad), ⁷⁷]. Mathematical tasks often require holding multiple pieces of information in mind (e.g., numbers, intermediate steps in a calculation, problem constraints) while performing operations or reasoning. A compromised working memory capacity can severely hinder these processes.
Long-Term Memory for Mathematical Facts: Individuals with dyscalculia often exhibit significant difficulty committing basic arithmetic facts (e.g., addition sums, multiplication tables) to long-term memory and retrieving them efficiently.¹ This results in a continued reliance on slower, more effortful counting strategies.
Visual-Spatial Skills: Difficulties in visual and spatial processing can also contribute to mathematical challenges in dyscalculia.²⁰ This can affect tasks such as aligning numbers in columns for multi-digit calculations, understanding geometric concepts, interpreting graphs and charts, or mentally manipulating spatial representations of numbers (like a mental number line).

Dyscalculia often presents a dual challenge involving both the retrieval of learned math facts and a deeper conceptual understanding of mathematical principles.¹ For example, an individual might struggle to recall that 7×8=56 (fact retrieval) and also fail to grasp the concept of multiplication as repeated addition or understand the commutative property (conceptual understanding). A weak foundational number sense would logically make it more difficult both to intuitively grasp mathematical concepts and to see the inherent relationships that make arithmetic facts memorable and meaningful. Poor working memory further complicates this by making it difficult to hold procedural steps in mind, thereby hindering both conceptual learning and the development of fluent calculation.

4.2. Academic Footprint: Challenges in Arithmetic Fact Retrieval, Calculation Fluency, and Mathematical Reasoning

The cognitive correlates of dyscalculia directly manifest in a range of academic difficulties in mathematics:

Memorization and Retrieval of Arithmetic Facts: A persistent struggle to memorize and automatically recall basic arithmetic facts (e.g., 2+2=4, 5×3=15) is a hallmark of dyscalculia.¹ This often leads to a continued reliance on finger counting or other immature counting strategies for simple calculations, long after peers have transitioned to direct retrieval.¹ This “developmental lag” in strategy use is a key indicator, suggesting a failure to internalize basic numerical relationships and automate procedures.
Accurate and Fluent Calculation: Mathematical calculations are typically slow, effortful, and prone to errors.¹ Individuals may get lost in the middle of arithmetic computations, misapply procedures, or switch between procedures inconsistently.¹
Mathematical Reasoning: A significant difficulty is observed in applying mathematical concepts, facts, or procedures to solve quantitative problems, especially word problems.¹ This involves challenges in understanding the problem, identifying the relevant information, selecting appropriate operations, and interpreting the results. Word problems can present a “double hurdle” as they require not only mathematical skill but also language comprehension to translate the narrative into a mathematical representation. If language processing issues co-occur (e.g., in comorbid dyslexia), this challenge is further compounded.⁷⁴
Understanding Mathematical Language and Symbols: Difficulties may arise in comprehending mathematical vocabulary (e.g., “sum,” “product,” “less than,” “factor”) and interpreting mathematical symbols (+, -, x, ÷, =, <, >).⁶⁹
Application to Everyday Math Tasks: The difficulties extend beyond the classroom to everyday situations requiring numerical competence, such as telling time (especially on an analog clock), counting and managing money, budgeting, following schedules, understanding measurements (e.g., in cooking), and estimating quantities.²⁰

4.3. Information Processing Characteristics: Numerical Symbolism, Quantitative Reasoning, and Visuospatial Processing in Math

The academic challenges in dyscalculia are rooted in how individuals process numerical and quantitative information:

Processing Numerical Information: There is a general difficulty in processing numerical information efficiently and accurately.² This can manifest as slowness in performing even simple numerical tasks or a higher error rate.
Numerical Symbolism: A core challenge lies in grasping the abstract nature of numbers and their symbolic representations (e.g., Arabic numerals).² Difficulties include learning and using mathematical symbols and functions for calculations, and recognizing printed numbers.² If the foundational understanding of what a number symbol means in terms of quantity is weak, all subsequent mathematical learning is impeded. This is why concrete manipulatives and real-life examples are often beneficial in instruction.⁸²
Quantitative Reasoning: This involves the ability to understand and reason about quantities, amounts, and numerical relationships. Individuals with dyscalculia often struggle with tasks like comparing numbers, understanding the concept of a number line, estimating quantities, and comprehending place value.⁶⁸
Visuospatial Processing in Mathematics: Many mathematical tasks have a significant visuospatial component. Difficulties in this area can manifest as problems with aligning numbers correctly in columns for multi-digit arithmetic, interpreting graphs and charts, understanding geometric shapes and their properties, or mentally visualizing number lines and spatial arrangements of numbers [²⁰ (visuospatial sketchpad), ⁷⁶]. Weak visuospatial skills can lead to errors in calculation due to misalignment or difficulty interpreting visual representations of mathematical information. For some individuals with dyscalculia, interventions targeting visuospatial skills may be as crucial as those targeting core number sense.
Sequential Processing: Difficulties with processing information in sequence are also relevant to dyscalculia. This can affect learning number sequences (e.g., counting), recalling steps in a mathematical procedure, or understanding concepts that rely on ordered information like schedules or timelines.²¹

4.4. Cognitive Landscape: Patterns of Strengths (e.g., Verbal Reasoning, Problem-Solving) and Weaknesses

Similar to dyslexia, dyscalculia is often characterized by a specific pattern of mathematical weaknesses coexisting with average or even strong abilities in other cognitive and academic domains.²⁰ This “math-specific” nature of the core deficit is a key aspect of its psychological profile.

Commonly Reported Strengths:

General Intelligence: Individuals with dyscalculia typically possess average or above-average intelligence.²⁰
Verbal and Linguistic Skills: Many excel in non-mathematical subjects such as languages, humanities, and arts, and may have good verbal communication and reasoning skills.²⁰ They might be good with words and social interactions.²¹
Creativity and Artistic Talents: Strengths in creative, artistic, or design fields are often noted.²⁰
Problem-Solving and Strategic Thinking: Some individuals develop strong problem-solving skills, perhaps by finding alternative, non-numerical ways to approach challenges. They may be good strategic thinkers and able to see the “bigger picture”.²¹ The struggle with conventional mathematical methods might foster creative thinking and resilience, leading them to approach problems from unique angles.²¹
Intuitive Thinking and Social Perception: Strengths in intuitive thinking, assessing situations based on “gut feel,” good face recognition, and reading nonverbal communication have been suggested.²¹

Key Weaknesses (beyond core math skills):

Number sense and magnitude representation (as detailed in 4.1).²
Working memory (especially for numerical and visuospatial information).⁶⁸
Long-term memory for math facts.²
Visual-spatial processing as it relates to mathematics.²⁰
Difficulties with concepts of time, measurement, and sometimes spatial reasoning in practical contexts (though a general deficit in spatial reasoning is not always implied).²¹
Concentration on mentally intensive tasks, especially those involving numbers.²¹
Sequential processing of numerical or time-related information.²¹

Recognizing this pattern of specific mathematical deficits alongside other cognitive strengths is crucial for accurate diagnosis (supporting the “unexpectedness” criterion), for maintaining self-esteem, for developing effective compensatory strategies (e.g., using strong verbal reasoning to talk through a math problem ⁸²), and for guiding educational and career choices toward areas that leverage these inherent strengths.⁸⁵

4.5. Associated Executive Function Deficits

Mathematical problem-solving is a complex cognitive endeavor that heavily relies on executive functions (EFs).⁸⁶ Deficits in EFs can significantly impair mathematical performance, either as a contributing factor to dyscalculia or as an exacerbating feature.

Working Memory: As previously discussed, this is a central EF often impaired in dyscalculia, crucial for holding numbers, intermediate calculation steps, and problem constraints in mind during mathematical operations.⁶⁸
Inhibition/Impulse Control: The ability to suppress distracting stimuli, ignore irrelevant information in word problems, or resist impulsive, incorrect answers is vital.⁷⁵
Cognitive Flexibility/Shifting: This involves the ability to switch between different mathematical operations, strategies, or steps within a complex problem, and to adapt if an initial approach is not working.⁸⁷
Planning and Organization: Essential for creating a coherent plan to solve a mathematical problem, organizing the steps involved, knowing which formulas or procedures to apply, and structuring written calculations.⁷⁸
Task Initiation: Difficulty starting mathematical tasks, particularly if they are perceived as challenging or anxiety-provoking, can be a significant barrier.⁸⁷
Self-Monitoring/Task Supervision: The capacity to monitor one’s work during problem-solving, check for errors, assess whether the answer makes sense, and stay aware of progress towards the solution is critical.⁸⁷
Emotional Control: Managing frustration, math anxiety, or discouragement that often accompanies mathematical difficulties is an important EF that impacts persistence and engagement.⁸⁷

Executive functions provide essential scaffolding for mathematical cognition. Weaknesses in these areas can directly lead to poor math performance, making it challenging to differentiate primary dyscalculia from math difficulties that are secondary to more general EF deficits, or to understand their combined impact.⁷⁵

Furthermore, math anxiety, which is highly prevalent among individuals with dyscalculia ²², can create a compounding negative effect. Anxiety itself is known to impair cognitive functions, particularly EFs like working memory and attention, as cognitive resources are diverted to managing anxious thoughts (“thoughts about how well you are doing can intrude into consciousness and disrupt the working memory resources”).⁷³ This can redirect blood flow away from brain centers critical for mathematical processing.⁹⁰ For an individual already grappling with underlying EF weaknesses or core dyscalculic deficits, the addition of math anxiety can further cripple their ability to focus, plan, and persist with mathematical tasks, leading to more errors and thereby reinforcing the anxiety. This creates a vicious cycle, underscoring the critical importance of addressing emotional and anxiety-related factors within interventions for dyscalculia.

Table 2: Core Cognitive Characteristics, Academic Manifestations, Information Processing Deficits, and Common Strengths in Dyslexia, Dysgraphia, and Dyscalculia

Feature	Disorder (Specifier)	Core Cognitive Correlates (Primary Weaknesses)	Key Academic Manifestations	Primary Information Processing Deficits	Common Cognitive Strengths
Impairment in Reading	Dyslexia ²	– Phonological processing deficit (awareness, memory, speed) <br> – Working memory (especially verbal) <br> – Processing speed (incl. RAN) <br> – Orthographic processing	– Inaccurate/slow word reading <br> – Poor reading fluency <br> – Reading comprehension difficulties (despite potential for good listening comprehension) <br> – Poor spelling	– Decoding (letter-sound correspondence) <br> – Orthographic mapping <br> – Sequential processing (auditory & visual)	– Reasoning, critical thinking <br> – Visuospatial skills, creativity <br> – “Big picture” thinking, conceptualization <br> – Strong oral vocabulary, listening comprehension <br> – Problem-solving, empathy ¹⁶
Impairment in Written Expression	Dysgraphia ¹⁸	– Fine motor skills/coordination <br> – Orthographic coding/memory <br> – Language output organization <br> – Visual-spatial processing (for some) <br> – Working memory (for writing tasks)	– Poor spelling <br> – Errors in grammar & punctuation <br> – Lack of clarity/organization in writing <br> – Illegible/slow handwriting <br> – Difficulty translating thoughts to paper	– Graphomotor execution <br> – Orthographic recall for writing <br> – Sequencing & organizing ideas for text <br> – Visual-spatial organization on page	– Good oral expression/storytelling <br> – Good listening skills <br> – Strong recall of (oral) details <br> – Interpersonal skills, leadership <br> – Problem-solving ¹⁸
Impairment in Mathematics	Dyscalculia ²	– Number sense/magnitude representation <br> – Working memory (numerical & visuospatial) <br> – Long-term memory for math facts <br> – Visual-spatial processing (for math)	– Difficulty with arithmetic fact retrieval <br> – Inaccurate/slow calculation <br> – Poor mathematical reasoning (e.g., word problems) <br> – Difficulty with math concepts, symbols, & vocabulary	– Processing numerical magnitude & relationships <br> – Symbolic representation of numbers <br> – Quantitative reasoning <br> – Visuospatial organization for math tasks <br> – Sequential processing of numerical info	– Average/above-average general intelligence <br> – Verbal reasoning, linguistic skills <br> – Creativity, artistic talents <br> – Intuitive thinking, problem-solving <br> – Strategic/”big picture” thinking ²⁰

5. Heterogeneity and Developmental Trajectories of Specific Learning Disorders

Specific Learning Disorders are not monolithic entities; they manifest with considerable variability across individuals and evolve throughout the lifespan.⁵⁹ This heterogeneity is influenced by a complex interplay of factors including the inherent severity of the disorder, the individual’s unique constellation of cognitive strengths, the development and utilization of compensatory mechanisms, and various genetic and environmental influences.¹⁶

5.1. Individual Variability: The Influence of Severity, Cognitive Strengths, and Compensatory Mechanisms

The expression of an SLD within any given individual is dynamic rather than static. Dyslexia, for example, is recognized to exist on a continuum of severity, ranging from mild difficulties that might be overcome with targeted support to more profound challenges requiring intensive, long-term intervention.¹⁶ Similarly, dysgraphia can vary from mild handwriting untidiness to severe impairments affecting all aspects of written expression ⁴³, and dyscalculia’s impact on mathematical abilities also spans a wide spectrum.⁷¹ The DSM-5 acknowledges this by requiring specification of current severity (Mild, Moderate, or Severe) for any SLD diagnosis, based on the degree of academic impairment and the level of support needed.²

An individual’s inherent cognitive strengths play a crucial role in mediating the functional impact of an SLD.¹⁶ For instance, a student with dyslexia who possesses strong verbal reasoning skills and a rich vocabulary may be better able to infer meaning from context, partially compensating for weak decoding skills.²³ Similarly, an individual with dysgraphia might leverage strong oral communication skills to convey knowledge in alternative formats ¹⁸, or someone with dyscalculia might use creative problem-solving approaches to tackle numerical tasks.²¹

Over time, individuals with SLDs often develop or are taught compensatory strategies to navigate their learning challenges.²³ These can range from simple techniques, like using mnemonic devices or assistive technology, to more complex metacognitive strategies for planning and monitoring their work. The effectiveness of these strategies, combined with the individual’s cognitive strengths, can significantly alter the observable manifestation of the SLD.⁴³ In some cases, particularly with milder forms of SLDs or in individuals with high overall cognitive ability, these compensatory mechanisms can be so effective that they “mask” the underlying learning difficulty.²³ This masking effect can sometimes delay diagnosis and access to appropriate support, as the individual may appear to be performing adequately, albeit often with considerably greater effort than their peers.²³ This underscores the importance of comprehensive assessments that look beyond surface-level academic achievement to evaluate underlying cognitive processes and the strategies employed by the individual. Consequently, two individuals with the same nominal SLD diagnosis can present with vastly different functional profiles, necessitating highly personalized approaches to assessment and intervention.

5.2. Lifespan Manifestations: Evolution of SLD Profiles from Childhood to Adulthood

SLDs are generally considered to be lifelong conditions, meaning the underlying neurobiological differences persist throughout an individual’s life.² However, the way these disorders manifest—their specific symptoms and their impact on daily functioning—can change significantly with age, evolving cognitive development, and shifting environmental demands.⁴

Dyslexia:

Preschool Years: Early indicators may include delayed speech development, slow vocabulary acquisition, difficulty learning the alphabet, numbers, or colors, trouble with rhyming games, and mispronouncing familiar words.¹⁷
Early School Years (Grades 1-3): Difficulties become more apparent with formal literacy instruction. Challenges include sounding out simple words, slow and inaccurate reading, poor spelling of common words, reliance on picture cues or memorization when reading, and confusion with similar-looking letters.¹⁷ However, strengths in listening comprehension, oral vocabulary, and problem-solving may also start to become evident.¹⁷
Later School Years (Grades 3-9): Reading often remains slow, inaccurate, and halting. Difficulties with multisyllabic words, reading comprehension (especially for complex texts), and spelling persist. Avoidance of reading aloud and writing tasks is common. Strengths in conceptual thinking, “big picture” understanding, and areas not dependent on reading (e.g., math, visual arts) may be more pronounced.¹⁷
Adolescence and Adulthood: While some reading skills may have improved with intervention and compensation, reading rate often remains slow, and spelling difficulties typically persist. Individuals may avoid reading for pleasure and struggle with timed academic tasks or learning foreign languages. However, this stage may also see a fuller expression of cognitive strengths such as high-level conceptualization, creativity, problem-solving, and empathy.²

Dysgraphia:

Childhood: Symptoms typically emerge when children are first learning to write. These include difficulties with letter formation, legibility, consistent sizing and spacing of letters, awkward pencil grip, slow writing speed, and early spelling problems.⁴³ Fine motor coordination challenges are often prominent.⁴³
Adolescence and Adulthood: While mechanical difficulties with handwriting may persist or improve somewhat with compensation (e.g., keyboarding), challenges may become more apparent in higher-level writing tasks. These include difficulties with grammar, syntax, punctuation, organizing thoughts coherently on paper, and expressing complex ideas in written form.⁴³ Adults may struggle with workplace writing demands such as composing emails, reports, or filling out forms by hand.⁵¹

Dyscalculia:

Preschool Years: Early signs can include difficulty learning to count rote, recognizing printed numbers, understanding basic quantity concepts (e.g., “more than”), and engaging with simple logic games involving shapes or matching.²⁰
Early School Years: Problems with learning basic arithmetic operations (addition, subtraction), memorizing number facts, understanding place value, and using math vocabulary become evident. Persistent finger counting is common.²⁰
Later School Years and Adolescence: Difficulties extend to more complex mathematical procedures, word problems, understanding fractions and percentages, and interpreting graphs or charts. Challenges with time management, estimating quantities, and handling money may become more impactful.²⁰
Adulthood: Persistent difficulties with everyday numerical tasks such as budgeting, financial planning, scheduling, mental arithmetic, and tasks requiring quantitative reasoning are common. Occupational choices may be influenced by these ongoing challenges.²⁰

Across all SLDs, as academic and life demands increase and become more complex, the manifestation of the disorder often shifts. Foundational skill deficits may evolve into challenges with fluency, organization, and higher-order reasoning within the affected domain.⁴ An SLD that was perhaps less impairing or better compensated for in earlier years might become more problematic when academic or occupational demands exceed the individual’s capacity to cope without further support or new strategies.² Conversely, with age and experience, adults with SLDs often develop a more refined understanding of their own strengths and weaknesses and may have cultivated more sophisticated compensatory strategies.¹⁷ This evolving profile of persistent weaknesses, honed strengths, and learned strategies shapes their choices and functioning in adulthood.

5.3. Impact on Higher Education and Occupational Trajectories

The persistent nature of SLDs means they can significantly influence pathways through higher education and into occupational life.²

Higher Education:

The transition to higher education often represents a critical juncture where the impact of SLDs can be amplified.100 The increased academic rigor, greater volume of reading and writing, more complex mathematical demands, and the need for greater independence in learning can pose substantial challenges. Students with dyslexia may struggle with extensive reading lists and essay writing; those with dysgraphia may find note-taking and written examinations particularly arduous; and students with dyscalculia may face difficulties in STEM courses or any field requiring quantitative analysis.81

Without appropriate support and accommodations, students with SLDs are at an increased risk of academic underachievement, lower grades, and potentially dropping out of higher education.² Success in this environment often hinges on several factors:

Access to Accommodations: This includes provisions such as extended time for examinations, use of assistive technology (e.g., text-to-speech software, calculators, word processors), alternative assessment formats, and note-taking support.⁶³
Self-Advocacy Skills: Unlike in K-12 education where IEPs are often school-driven, students in higher education must typically self-identify and actively advocate for their needs and accommodations.¹⁰²
Institutional Support and Awareness: The knowledge, attitudes, and preparedness of university faculty and support services play a significant role in creating an inclusive and supportive learning environment.¹⁰¹ Many university teachers report feeling unprepared to adequately support students with dyslexia and express a need for practical training.¹⁰¹

Course and major choices may also be influenced by an SLD. Students might consciously or unconsciously avoid subjects or fields they perceive as heavily reliant on their areas of weakness.⁸¹

Occupational Trajectories:

SLDs can also affect occupational choices and long-term career paths. There is an increased risk of unemployment or underemployment for individuals with unrecognized or unsupported SLDs.2 Workplace challenges can arise in roles that demand extensive reading, writing, or mathematical skills, particularly if accommodations are not available or utilized.2 Adults may limit their career aspirations or avoid certain job roles due to fear of inadequacy or past negative experiences.99

However, occupational outcomes are not predetermined and are highly malleable. Many adults with SLDs achieve significant professional success.⁹⁹ Key factors contributing to positive occupational outcomes include:

Leveraging Individual Strengths: Choosing careers that align with inherent cognitive strengths (e.g., creativity, problem-solving, visuospatial skills, verbal abilities) is crucial.²⁴
Effective Compensatory Strategies: Continued use and refinement of strategies learned, including advanced assistive technologies, can help manage workplace demands.⁶³
Workplace Accommodations: Self-disclosure to employers (when comfortable and appropriate) can facilitate necessary accommodations, such as modified tasks, assistive technology, or flexible work arrangements.¹⁰²
Supportive Work Environments: A workplace culture that values neurodiversity and is willing to provide reasonable adjustments can make a significant difference.

Longitudinal studies suggest that while students with SLDs may initially have lower career aspirations, these patterns can change over time with appropriate support and intervention.¹⁰³ Early and ongoing support, focusing on both remediating weaknesses and building upon strengths, is critical for fostering positive long-term educational and occupational outcomes.¹⁰⁵

6. The Interplay of Co-occurring Conditions with Specific Learning Disorders

Specific Learning Disorders rarely occur in isolation. A significant body of research indicates that SLDs frequently co-occur with other neurodevelopmental and mental health conditions.² This phenomenon of comorbidity is so prevalent that it is often considered the rule rather than the exception, profoundly influencing the psychological and cognitive profile of the individual and complicating diagnosis and intervention.⁷⁷

6.1. Common Comorbidities: ADHD, Anxiety Disorders, and Mood Disorders

Among the most frequently reported co-occurring conditions are:

Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): This is one of the most common comorbidities with all types of SLDs.¹⁰⁶

Dyslexia and ADHD: Estimates for the co-occurrence of dyslexia and ADHD vary but are consistently high, ranging from 12-24% up to 42% or even higher in some studies.⁴⁰ Conversely, dyslexia is the most common SLD found in individuals with ADHD.⁴¹
Dysgraphia and ADHD: There is a significant overlap between ADHD and dysgraphia, with children with ADHD being more likely to exhibit symptoms of dysgraphia.⁴⁶ Executive function deficits common in ADHD (e.g., planning, organization) directly impact writing skills.¹¹²
Dyscalculia and ADHD: Approximately 11% of children with dyscalculia also have ADHD.⁶⁸ Some studies report that 20-60% of individuals with dyscalculia have other diagnosed conditions like dyslexia or ADHD.⁷⁴

Anxiety Disorders: Anxiety is a very common emotional comorbidity in individuals with SLDs.² Research indicates that around 70% of youth with SLDs experience higher levels of anxiety symptoms compared to their non-diagnosed peers.¹¹⁷ This can manifest as generalized anxiety, social anxiety, or specific anxieties related to academic performance (e.g., test anxiety, reading anxiety, math anxiety).²²
Mood Disorders (e.g., Depression): Difficulties associated with SLDs can also contribute to the development of mood disorders, particularly depression.² The persistent academic struggles, feelings of failure, and social challenges can lead to low self-esteem, hopelessness, and sadness.¹¹⁹ Depression is estimated to be significantly more prevalent in adults with ADHD, a condition often comorbid with SLDs.¹¹¹

Other conditions that frequently co-occur with SLDs include speech and language impairments (which can be precursors or co-travelers with dyslexia), Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD, also known as dyspraxia, which has motor components that can overlap with dysgraphia), and externalizing behavior problems such as conduct disorders.¹⁶ The high rates of comorbidity strongly suggest that individuals presenting with one SLD should be assessed for other neurodevelopmental or mental health conditions, as this holistic understanding is crucial for effective intervention planning.⁷⁴

6.2. Impact of Comorbidities on SLD Profiles: Amplified Challenges and Complex Presentations

The presence of co-occurring conditions significantly complicates the psychological and cognitive profile of an SLD, often amplifying existing challenges and creating more complex clinical presentations.¹⁰⁶

Interaction with ADHD:

When ADHD co-occurs with an SLD, the impact on cognitive functions, particularly executive functions, is often additive or synergistic.

Dyslexia and ADHD: Both conditions share underlying weaknesses in areas like working memory, processing speed, and aspects of attention.⁴⁰ ADHD’s core symptoms of inattention, impulsivity, and hyperactivity can exacerbate the difficulties dyslexic individuals face in sustaining focus during reading, organizing their approach to literacy tasks, and persisting through challenging material.⁴⁰ For example, a child with dyslexia might already struggle with decoding; comorbid ADHD can make it even harder to attend to the necessary phonological details or to remember what was just read due to working memory and attention deficits.⁴¹ Written work for individuals with both conditions may show problems with organization and structure (more related to ADHD’s EF impact) alongside spelling and grammar issues (more related to dyslexia).⁴¹ Individuals with comorbid dyslexia and ADHD often present with more severe academic impairments and may show a different response to interventions compared to those with dyslexia alone.⁷⁴ They are also at higher risk for both internalizing (e.g., anxiety, depression) and externalizing (e.g., behavioral) problems.¹¹³
Dysgraphia and ADHD: Executive function deficits inherent in ADHD—such as difficulties with planning, organization, task initiation, and sustained attention—directly impact the writing process, which is already challenging for individuals with dysgraphia.¹¹² The impulsivity of ADHD can also hinder the careful practice needed to refine motor skills for handwriting.¹¹² The combination can lead to profoundly disorganized and effortful written output, even if ideational abilities are strong.
Dyscalculia and ADHD: ADHD can impair the attention, working memory, and organizational skills necessary for mathematical problem-solving, compounding the core numerical deficits seen in dyscalculia.⁷⁴ Difficulty sustaining focus during multi-step calculations or remembering number facts can be exacerbated by ADHD.

Interaction with Anxiety and Mood Disorders:

The chronic stress, academic failure, and social difficulties associated with SLDs can contribute to the development of anxiety and depression.109 Conversely, these emotional states can further impair cognitive functioning and learning.

Impact on Cognitive Profile: Anxiety, particularly performance anxiety or math anxiety, can consume working memory resources, making it harder for individuals with SLDs to access and apply the cognitive skills they do possess.⁷³ Thoughts about potential failure or negative evaluation can interfere with concentration and problem-solving.⁷³ Depression can lead to measurable decreases in attention, executive function (planning, organization), and recall memory, further slowing information processing and making learning more arduous.¹¹⁹ This creates a vicious cycle where the SLD contributes to emotional distress, and the emotional distress exacerbates the learning difficulties.¹¹⁹
Behavioral Manifestations: Anxiety may lead to avoidance behaviors (e.g., avoiding reading aloud, refusing to do math homework).⁷³ Depression can manifest as low motivation, withdrawal, or irritability.¹¹⁶ Children with SLD and comorbid anxiety or depression may exhibit more internalizing problems.⁴²
Perfectionism and Shame: Socially prescribed perfectionism (feeling pressure from others to be perfect) can increase generalized anxiety in individuals with SLD, while both socially prescribed perfectionism and shame can predict social anxiety.¹¹⁷ The fear of confirming negative stereotypes about their abilities (stereotype threat) can also contribute to anxiety and avoidance.¹¹⁸

The presence of multiple deficits, whether cognitive (e.g., phonological and executive function weaknesses) or emotional (e.g., SLD and anxiety), often leads to more severe overall impairment than would be expected from a single disorder.⁷⁴ This underscores the necessity of a comprehensive diagnostic approach that screens for common comorbidities and an intervention plan that addresses all co-existing conditions in an integrated manner.⁷⁴ Treating only the SLD without addressing comorbid ADHD or anxiety, for example, is unlikely to yield optimal outcomes.

7. Assessment and Differentiation of Specific Learning Disorder Profiles

The diagnosis of Specific Learning Disorders requires a comprehensive, multi-faceted assessment process conducted by a team of qualified professionals, which may include psychologists, educational specialists, speech-language pathologists, and medical practitioners.³ The goals of this assessment are to identify the presence and nature of the SLD, determine the specific academic domains and underlying cognitive processes affected, differentiate the SLD from other conditions that might cause learning difficulties, and inform the development of appropriate interventions and support.¹⁴

7.1. Comprehensive Psychoeducational and Neuropsychological Assessment

A thorough assessment typically involves several key components:

Clinical Interview and History Taking: Gathering detailed information about the individual’s developmental, medical, family, and educational history is crucial.³ This includes exploring the onset and persistence of learning difficulties, previous interventions and their effectiveness, family history of learning or attention problems, and any co-occurring conditions.²⁷ Interviews with parents, teachers, and the individual (if age-appropriate) provide valuable contextual information.⁶¹
Behavioral Observations and Rating Scales: Observing the individual’s approach to academic tasks and behavior in different settings (e.g., during testing, in the classroom) can offer qualitative insights.¹²¹ Standardized rating scales completed by parents, teachers, and sometimes the individual can help assess attention, executive functions, and emotional/behavioral functioning, aiding in the identification of comorbid conditions like ADHD or anxiety.³
Assessment of Intellectual/Cognitive Abilities (IQ Testing): Standardized tests of general cognitive ability (IQ tests) are administered to understand an individual’s overall intellectual potential and to identify patterns of cognitive strengths and weaknesses.²⁷ While no longer used as the sole basis for an IQ-achievement discrepancy diagnosis ⁵, these tests help rule out intellectual disability as the primary cause of learning difficulties and can reveal relative strengths in areas like verbal reasoning or nonverbal problem-solving that can be leveraged in interventions. Commonly used tests include the Wechsler scales (e.g., WISC, WAIS), Stanford-Binet, and Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Abilities.⁷⁹ These can also provide information on underlying processing areas such as working memory, processing speed, verbal comprehension, and perceptual reasoning.⁷⁹
Assessment of Academic Achievement: Standardized, individually administered achievement tests are used to measure skills in specific academic areas such as reading (word recognition, decoding, fluency, comprehension), written expression (spelling, grammar, composition, handwriting), and mathematics (calculation, fluency, reasoning, problem-solving).⁴ Performance is compared to age and grade-level expectations. Examples include the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test (WIAT), Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Achievement (WJ Achievement), and Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement (KTEA).⁷⁹
Assessment of Specific Cognitive Processes (Neuropsychological Testing): To understand the underlying reasons for academic difficulties, specific cognitive processes are often assessed in more detail. This is where neuropsychological testing plays a key role.²

For Dyslexia: Assessments target phonological awareness (e.g., Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing – CTOPP-2), phonics skills, rapid automatized naming (e.g., RAN/RAS tasks, subtests of CTOPP-2), word reading efficiency (e.g., Test of Word Reading Efficiency – TOWRE), oral reading fluency (e.g., Gray Oral Reading Tests – GORT-5), reading comprehension (e.g., Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests – WRMT, Feifer Assessment of Reading – FAR), and oral language skills (e.g., Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals – CELF-5, Comprehensive Assessment of Spoken Language – CASL).²⁷ Working memory (e.g., digit span, sentence repetition from cognitive or language tests) is also critical.
For Dysgraphia: Evaluation includes assessment of fine motor skills (e.g., Beery VMI, NEPSY-II sensorimotor subtests), handwriting legibility and speed, spelling (e.g., subtests from achievement batteries), visual-motor integration, orthographic processing, and written expression at the sentence and discourse level (e.g., Test of Written Language – TOWL-4, WIAT/WJ Achievement writing subtests, Feifer Assessment of Writing – FAW).⁵³ Executive functions related to writing (planning, organization) are also considered, often through qualitative analysis of written products or specific EF tests.¹²⁴
For Dyscalculia: Assessment focuses on number sense (e.g., comparing quantities, number line estimation), memorization and retrieval of arithmetic facts, calculation accuracy and fluency, mathematical reasoning and problem-solving (e.g., KeyMath-3, WIAT/WJ Achievement math subtests, Feifer Assessment of Mathematics – FAM), and understanding of mathematical concepts and symbols.⁷⁵ Working memory (especially visuospatial and numerical) and visual-spatial skills relevant to math are also assessed.⁷⁵
Response to Intervention (RTI): In educational settings, a student’s response to evidence-based, targeted interventions is often considered as part of the diagnostic process.¹³ Persistent difficulties despite high-quality instruction and intervention support the likelihood of an SLD.⁴

7.2. Differentiating Between Dyslexia, Dysgraphia, and Dyscalculia

While SLDs can co-occur, careful assessment aims to identify the primary area(s) of impairment and the specific cognitive profile associated with each.

Dyslexia vs. Dysgraphia: Dyslexia’s core is difficulty with reading and decoding, primarily due to phonological deficits.¹⁶ Spelling is also typically very weak. Dysgraphia’s core is difficulty with written expression, which can stem from motor difficulties (poor handwriting), orthographic/spelling problems, or difficulties organizing thoughts for writing.⁴³ A student might read adequately but write poorly (suggesting dysgraphia without dyslexia), or struggle with both (suggesting comorbid dyslexia and dysgraphia, or that reading deficits are impacting writing).⁴⁶ Assessment tools focusing on phonological processing, decoding, and reading fluency help identify dyslexia, while tests of handwriting, spelling in isolation and context, and composition skills help identify dysgraphia.¹²¹ The Feifer Assessment of Writing (FAW) is specifically designed to differentiate subtypes of writing disorders, including a “dyslexic index” which can help parse these relationships.¹²⁴
Dyslexia vs. Dyscalculia: Dyslexia primarily affects literacy skills, while dyscalculia affects numeracy skills.⁵⁹ However, dyslexia can impact math performance, especially on word problems (due to reading demands) or with memorization of math facts (if there are general memory or sequencing issues).⁷⁴ True dyscalculia involves a core deficit in number sense or basic numerical processing, which would be identified through specific math assessments and tasks evaluating understanding of quantity, magnitude, and basic calculation, independent of reading ability.⁷⁴
Dysgraphia vs. Dyscalculia: Dysgraphia affects written expression broadly.⁵⁹ Dyscalculia specifically affects mathematical abilities.⁵⁹ A student with dysgraphia might struggle to write math equations legibly or organize their work on the page, even if they understand the math concepts. A student with dyscalculia would struggle with the math concepts themselves, regardless of writing ability. Assessment would differentiate based on performance on math reasoning and calculation tasks versus tasks of general written expression and handwriting.

The comprehensive assessment, integrating data from multiple sources and specific cognitive and academic tests, allows clinicians to build a detailed profile of an individual’s strengths and weaknesses. This profile forms the basis for a differential diagnosis, distinguishing between the SLDs, identifying any co-occurring conditions, and ruling out other explanations for the learning difficulties.⁶¹ This detailed understanding is essential for tailoring effective, individualized intervention plans.

8. Cross-Cutting Cognitive Factors: Executive Functions, Visuospatial Processing, and Sequential Information Processing

Beyond the core deficits specific to reading, writing, or mathematics, certain cognitive functions play a significant, often overlapping, role across the spectrum of Specific Learning Disorders. Understanding how executive functions, visuospatial processing, and sequential information processing are implicated in dyslexia, dysgraphia, and dyscalculia provides a more holistic view of these conditions.

8.1. The Role of Executive Functions Across SLDs

Executive functions (EFs) – including planning, organization, working memory, inhibition, cognitive flexibility, task initiation, and self-monitoring – are crucial for all forms of academic learning.³⁸ Deficits in EFs are commonly associated with SLDs, either as a contributing factor, an exacerbating element, or a consequence of the persistent struggle with learning.⁵

Dyslexia: While phonological deficits are primary, EFs like working memory are consistently implicated.¹⁶ Planning and organization are needed to tackle lengthy reading assignments or structure written responses about texts. Task initiation can be affected by the anticipation of difficulty. Sustained attention during the effortful process of reading is also an EF challenge.³⁹ Metacognitive skills (self-monitoring comprehension) are vital for effective reading.³⁹
Dysgraphia: Writing is an intensely EF-demanding task.⁵⁵ Planning (outlining), organizing (structuring sentences and paragraphs), working memory (holding ideas while transcribing), task initiation (overcoming writer’s block), self-monitoring (editing), and cognitive flexibility (revising) are all essential.⁴³ Deficits in these EFs are central to many presentations of dysgraphia, especially those involving clarity and organization of written expression.⁴
Dyscalculia: Mathematical problem-solving heavily relies on EFs.⁸⁶ Working memory is needed to hold numbers and intermediate steps during calculations. Planning is required to determine the sequence of operations. Inhibition is necessary to ignore irrelevant information in word problems. Cognitive flexibility allows for shifting between different strategies. Self-monitoring helps in checking the reasonableness of answers.⁷⁵

The interplay is often bidirectional: EF weaknesses can hinder academic skill acquisition, and the persistent frustration and cognitive load of struggling with an SLD can, in turn, deplete EF resources, making self-regulation more difficult.

8.2. Visuospatial Processing: Strengths and Weaknesses

Visuospatial processing involves the ability to perceive, analyze, and manipulate visual patterns and spatial relationships. Its role varies across the different SLDs.

Dyslexia: While primarily a language-based disorder, some individuals with dyslexia exhibit remarkable strengths in visuospatial reasoning.¹⁶ This can manifest as talent in visual arts, engineering, mechanics, or an ability to think in pictures. Some research even suggests advantages in specific visuospatial tasks, potentially reflecting compensatory neural pathways or different processing styles.²⁶ However, other studies have noted visual-spatial deficits in some individuals with dyslexia, particularly in tasks involving visual attention, visual-motor integration, or mental rotation, especially in younger children.³⁷ The relationship is complex and may depend on the specific visuospatial skill being assessed and the age of the individual.
Dysgraphia: Visuospatial skills are critical for the mechanics of handwriting and the organization of text on a page.⁴³ Weaknesses in visual-spatial processing can lead to difficulties with letter formation (distinguishing subtle visual differences in letters), inconsistent spacing between letters and words, inability to write in a straight line, poor alignment within margins, and general disorganization of written work on the page.¹⁸ “Spatial dysgraphia” is a subtype specifically attributed to deficits in spatial perception.⁴⁵
Dyscalculia: Visuospatial abilities are important for many aspects of mathematics.²⁰ This includes aligning numbers in columns for computation, understanding place value (which has a spatial component), interpreting graphs and geometric figures, mentally manipulating objects in space (e.g., for geometry), and using number lines. Weaknesses in the visuospatial sketchpad of working memory are often implicated in dyscalculia.⁷⁵ Difficulties can manifest in organizing written math work or understanding information presented visually in textbooks or on the board.⁷⁶ Some individuals with dyscalculia also report challenges with judging distances, reading maps, or left-right orientation in daily life.⁷⁷

8.3. Sequential Information Processing: A Common Thread?

Sequential processing refers to the ability to perceive, remember, and organize information in a specific order. Difficulties in this domain appear to be a significant factor in several SLDs, particularly dyslexia.

Dyslexia: A robust body of evidence links dyslexia to difficulties with sequential processing, impacting both auditory and visual modalities.¹⁶ This manifests as trouble remembering the sequence of letters in words (affecting reading and spelling), syllables in multisyllabic words, and even non-linguistic sequences like the alphabet, numbers, days of the week, or months of the year.³⁶ Tasks requiring ordered motor actions, like shoe-tying or long division steps, can also be challenging.³⁶ Reduced short-term memory capacity often co-occurs, making it harder to process and retain sequences of information.³⁵
Dysgraphia: Sequential processing is vital for writing. This includes sequencing letters to form words, words to form sentences, and sentences to form coherent paragraphs.¹⁸ Language-based dysgraphia, in particular, is associated with delays in processing and sequencing ideas for writing.¹⁸ Difficulties in organizing written work and maintaining a logical flow of thought can be, in part, a manifestation of underlying sequential processing weaknesses.
Dyscalculia: Mathematical operations often involve a sequence of steps that must be performed in a specific order (e.g., long division, solving equations).⁷⁰ Difficulty remembering and executing these sequences correctly is a common feature of dyscalculia. Challenges with counting (especially backwards), understanding number patterns, recalling schedules, and organizing multi-step problems can all be linked to weaknesses in sequential memory and processing.²¹

While the primary manifestation of sequential processing deficits may differ across SLDs (e.g., phoneme sequencing in dyslexia vs. procedural step sequencing in dyscalculia), it appears to be a cognitive domain that can contribute to difficulties in multiple academic areas.

9. Leveraging Strengths and Compensatory Strategies

A crucial aspect of understanding and supporting individuals with SLDs involves recognizing their inherent cognitive strengths and fostering the development of effective compensatory strategies. This approach moves beyond a purely deficit-focused model to empower individuals by capitalizing on their assets.

9.1. Capitalizing on Cognitive Strengths

Dyslexia: Individuals with dyslexia often possess strengths in areas like visuospatial reasoning, creativity, holistic thinking, problem-solving, and strong oral language skills.¹⁶ The “Sea of Strengths” model emphasizes identifying and leveraging these assets.²⁵ For example, strong visuospatial skills can be used to create mind maps for organizing information, or creativity can be channeled into alternative ways of demonstrating understanding (e.g., projects, presentations). Strong listening comprehension can be supported by providing information through audio formats.¹⁷
Dysgraphia: Strengths in verbal expression, oral storytelling, and listening comprehension are common in individuals with dysgraphia.² These can be leveraged by allowing oral responses or presentations, using speech-to-text software, and focusing on the content of ideas rather than solely on the mechanics of writing.⁴⁸ Problem-solving and leadership skills can also be assets in collaborative environments.¹⁹
Dyscalculia: Strengths in verbal reasoning, creativity, intuitive thinking, and strategic problem-solving are often noted.²⁰ These can be applied by encouraging individuals to “talk through” math problems, use verbal explanations, or find unconventional solutions. Creative talents might be used to visualize mathematical concepts in novel ways.⁸² For students with comorbid dyslexia and dyscalculia, multimodal materials and manipulatives can be particularly helpful, catering to potential visual or kinesthetic learning preferences.¹³³

9.2. Effective Compensatory Strategies and Accommodations

Compensatory strategies and accommodations are designed to help individuals with SLDs bypass or mitigate their areas of difficulty, allowing them to access learning and demonstrate their knowledge more effectively. These strategies evolve across the lifespan and are crucial in academic, occupational, and daily life settings.

For Dyslexia:
Academic/Occupational: Assistive technology is paramount, including text-to-speech software, audiobooks, smart pens, and spell checkers.⁹⁴ Accommodations like extended time for reading and writing tasks, preferential seating, and provision of notes are common.²⁹ Multisensory instructional approaches (e.g., Orton-Gillingham) are foundational for remediation.²⁵ Adults benefit from creating quiet workspaces, breaking tasks down, using digital tools for organization, and seeking support from tutors or occupational therapists.⁹⁴
For Dysgraphia:
Educational/Workplace: Use of word processors, speech-to-text software, and graphic organizers is highly beneficial.⁴⁸ Accommodations include extended time, modified assignments (reduced writing load), alternative response formats (oral exams), scribe services, and focusing on content over mechanics in grading (for non-writing specific tasks).⁴⁸ Occupational therapy can help with fine motor skills and handwriting, while explicit instruction in writing processes (planning, drafting, editing) is also key.⁶⁴
For Dyscalculia:
Academic/Daily Life: Use of calculators, math facts tables, number lines, and graph paper are common accommodations.⁷⁶ Providing ample workspace, breaking problems into smaller steps, and allowing extra time are also helpful.⁸³ Multisensory instruction, use of manipulatives (e.g., Cuisenaire rods), and real-life examples can make abstract concepts more concrete.⁸² Educational therapy and specialized math programs can provide targeted support.⁹⁰ Emotional support to address math anxiety is also critical.⁹⁰

Across all SLDs, fostering self-understanding and self-advocacy skills is essential, enabling individuals to request appropriate accommodations and leverage their strengths effectively throughout their education and careers.⁶⁴

10. Conclusion

The psychological profiles of Specific Learning Disorders—dyslexia, dysgraphia, and dyscalculia—are characterized by distinct patterns of cognitive strengths and weaknesses that significantly impact academic achievement and information processing. While each SLD has a core area of impairment (reading, written expression, or mathematics), they share commonalities as neurodevelopmental conditions with lifelong implications.

A primary finding is the critical role of specific cognitive correlates unique to each disorder. Dyslexia is fundamentally linked to deficits in phonological processing, often accompanied by challenges in working memory and processing speed. Dysgraphia presents as a multifaceted disorder with potential weaknesses in fine-motor skills, orthographic processing, language output organization, and sometimes visual-spatial skills. Dyscalculia is characterized by core difficulties in number sense, magnitude representation, and mathematical working memory. These underlying cognitive differences dictate the nature of the academic struggles observed: inaccurate and non-fluent reading and spelling in dyslexia; difficulties with spelling, grammar, organization, and the mechanics of writing in dysgraphia; and problems with arithmetic fact retrieval, calculation, and mathematical reasoning in dyscalculia.

The manifestation of these SLDs is not uniform. Individual variability is substantial, influenced by the severity of the disorder, the individual’s unique cognitive strengths (e.g., visuospatial skills in dyslexia, verbal fluency in dysgraphia, creative problem-solving in dyscalculia), and the development and use of compensatory strategies. These profiles also evolve across the lifespan, with early foundational skill deficits often transforming into challenges with more complex academic and occupational tasks in adolescence and adulthood. The impact on higher education and career trajectories can be significant, but positive outcomes are achievable with appropriate support, accommodations, and a focus on leveraging individual strengths.

Co-occurring conditions, particularly ADHD, anxiety disorders, and mood disorders, are highly prevalent and can profoundly influence the SLD profile by amplifying cognitive challenges (especially in executive functions) and adding emotional and behavioral complexities. This necessitates a comprehensive and holistic approach to assessment and intervention that addresses all co-existing conditions.

Assessment of SLDs relies on a comprehensive clinical evaluation, including detailed history, behavioral observations, and standardized psychometric testing of intellectual abilities, academic skills, and specific underlying cognitive processes. This allows for differentiation between the SLDs, identification of comorbid conditions, and the development of a nuanced understanding of an individual’s unique learning profile.

Ultimately, understanding the distinct psychological and cognitive characteristics of each SLD, recognizing individual and developmental variability, and acknowledging the impact of co-occurring conditions are paramount. Such an understanding allows for the development of targeted interventions, the effective use of compensatory strategies, and the crucial leveraging of cognitive strengths. This empowers individuals with SLDs to navigate their challenges and achieve their full potential across academic, occupational, and personal domains. Future research should continue to explore the complex interplay of these factors to refine diagnostic methods and optimize intervention strategies for this diverse population.

Works cited

Specific Learning Disorder – PsychDB, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.psychdb.com/child/learning/home
What Are Specific Learning Disorders? – Psychiatry.org, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.psychiatry.org/patients-families/specific-learning-disorder/what-is-specific-learning-disorder
Specific Learning Disorders – American Counseling Association, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.counseling.org/docs/default-source/practice-briefs/specific-learning-disorders.pdf?sfvrsn=5f563e19_1
Specific Learning Disorder DSM-5 Diagnosis Criteria – Carepatron, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.carepatron.com/files/specific-learning-disorder-dsm-5-diagnosis-criteria.pdf
Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD) 101 – Undivided, accessed May 13, 2025, https://undivided.io/resources/specific-learning-disabilities-sld-101-1315
Clinical descriptions and diagnostic requirements for ICD-11 mental, behavioural and neurodevelopmental disorders – IRIS Home, accessed May 13, 2025, https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/375767/9789240077263-eng.pdf?sequence=1
Developmental learning disorder – ICD-11 MMS – Find-A-Code, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.findacode.com/icd-11/block-2099676649.html
NAIT Guide to ICD-11 and Neurodevelopmental Assessment – ThirdSpace, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.thirdspace.scot/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/NAIT-Guide-to-ICD-11.pdf
6A03.0 Developmental learning disorder with impairment in reading …, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.findacode.com/icd-11/code-1008636089.html
Science | Dysgraphia Life, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.dysgraphia.life/what-is-dysgraphia/science
6A03.1 Developmental learning disorder with impairment in written expression – ICD-11 MMS – Find-A-Code, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.findacode.com/icd-11/code-1498766637.html
6A03.2 Developmental learning disorder with impairment in mathematics – ICD-11 MMS, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.findacode.com/icd-11/code-771231188.html
Clinical Characteristics of Learning Disabilities – Mental Disorders …, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK332886/
How are learning disabilities diagnosed? | NICHD – Eunice Kennedy …, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.nichd.nih.gov/health/topics/learning/conditioninfo/diagnosed
The Use of Cognitive Tests in the Assessment of Dyslexia – PMC – PubMed Central, accessed May 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10219499/
What is dyslexia? – British Dyslexia Association, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.bdadyslexia.org.uk/dyslexia/about-dyslexia/what-is-dyslexia
2.3 What Dyslexia Looks Like at Various Ages and Grades | CDE, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.cde.state.co.us/cdesped/dyslexia-lifecycle
www.education.sa.gov.au, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.education.sa.gov.au/docs/support-and-inclusion/practice-guidance/dysgraphia-practice-guidance-fact-sheet.pdf
What is Dysgraphia? | Causes & Signs – Exceptional Individuals, accessed May 13, 2025, https://exceptionalindividuals.com/neurodiversity/what-is-dysgraphia/
Dyscalculia | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/social-sciences-and-humanities/dyscalculia
What is Dyscalculia? – Exceptional Individuals, accessed May 13, 2025, https://exceptionalindividuals.com/neurodiversity/what-is-dyscalculia/
Dyscalculia – Equality and Diversity Unit – University of Oxford, accessed May 13, 2025, https://edu.admin.ox.ac.uk/dyscalculia
Definition and Continuum of Dyslexia | Fairfax County Public Schools, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.fcps.edu/academics/academic-overview/special-education-instruction/high-incidence-disabilities-team-k-12-1
Visual & Spatial Strengths of Dyslexia — Read Write, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.readwritelearningcenter.com/blog-readwrite/spotlight-visual-spatial-strengths-dyslexia
Leveraging Strengths to Overcome the Challenges of Dyslexia …, accessed May 13, 2025, https://strategiesforlearning.com/leveraging-strengths-to-overcome-the-challenges-of-dyslexia/
Neural correlates of language and non-language visuospatial …, accessed May 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4167780/
Testing and Evaluation – International Dyslexia Association, accessed May 13, 2025, https://dyslexiaida.org/testing-and-evaluation/
Dyslexia: What It Is, Causes, Symptoms, Treatment & Types – Cleveland Clinic, accessed May 13, 2025, https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/6005-dyslexia
Teaching Strategies for Students with Dyslexia, accessed May 13, 2025, https://soeonline.american.edu/blog/teaching-strategies-students-with-dyslexia/
How Does Dyslexia Influence Academic Achievement? – Atlantis Press, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125978550.pdf
Dyslexia Symptoms to Look For When Testing at Different Stages – WPS, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.wpspublish.com/content/infographic/dyslexia-symptoms-to-look-for-when-testing-at-different-stages
How to Recognize Dyslexia Symptoms by Age – Healthline, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.healthline.com/health/dyslexia-symptoms-by-age
Dyslexia – Symptoms and causes – Mayo Clinic, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/dyslexia/symptoms-causes/syc-20353552
Signs of Dyslexia, accessed May 13, 2025, https://dyslexia.yale.edu/dyslexia/signs-of-dyslexia/
Dyslexia – Other Strands | Dyslexia Awareness, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.dyslexia-aware.com/dawn/dyslexia-other-strands
Sequencing Difficulties: A Symptom of Dyslexia – Edublox Online Tutor, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.edubloxtutor.com/sequencing-difficulties-symptom-dyslexia/
The Role of Visual-Spatial Abilities in Dyslexia: Age Differences in …, accessed May 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5174111/
Executive Functioning • Dyslexia Support South, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.dyslexiasupportsouth.org.nz/parent-toolkit/resources/executive-functioning/
Executive functioning in the classroom • Dyslexia Support South, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.dyslexiasupportsouth.org.nz/school-toolkit/executive-functioning-in-the-classroom/
The Dyslexia and ADHD Connection – ADDitude, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.additudemag.com/adhd-dyslexia-connection/
ADHD and Dyslexia: How to Help Children Thrive in School, accessed May 13, 2025, https://dyslexiaaction.org.uk/2024/03/adhd-and-dyslexia-helping-children-thrive-in-school/
(PDF) Comparison of Cognitive and Behavioral Profiles of …, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375307136_Comparison_of_Cognitive_and_Behavioral_Profiles_of_Individuals_with_Attention_Deficit_Hyperactivity_Disorder_and_Dyslexia
Dysgraphia: What It Is, Symptoms, Diagnosis & Treatment, accessed May 13, 2025, https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/23294-dysgraphia
Understanding Dysgraphia – Child Mind Institute, accessed May 13, 2025, https://childmind.org/article/understanding-dysgraphia/
Disorder of written expression and dysgraphia: definition, diagnosis, and management – PMC – PubMed Central, accessed May 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7082241/
Dysgraphia vs. Dyslexia: Key Differences, Symptoms & Treatment, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.handspringhealth.com/post/dysgraphia-vs-dyslexia
Dysgraphia | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/health-and-medicine/dysgraphia
What Teachers Should Know About Dysgraphia – Edutopia, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.edutopia.org/article/what-teachers-should-know-about-dysgraphia/
Dysgraphia and Writing Problems | WTAMU, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.wtamu.edu/academics/college-education-social-sciences/department-education/special-programs/center-learning-disabilities/resources/learning-disabilities-writing.html
Dysgraphia: A Disorder of Written Expression Signs and Symptoms – ADDitude, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.additudemag.com/what-is-dysgraphia-understanding-common-symptoms/
Dysgraphia in Children and Adults: Signs, Symptoms, and Treatments | Ability Central, accessed May 13, 2025, https://abilitycentral.org/article/dysgraphia-children-and-adults-signs-symptoms-and-treatments
Dysgraphia: Symptoms, Diagnosis, Comorbid Conditions – The M Center, accessed May 13, 2025, https://themwellnesscenter.com/dysgraphia-symptoms-diagnosis-comorbid-conditions/
Dysgraphia – Neuropsychology Concierge, accessed May 13, 2025, https://neuropsychconcierge.com/conditions-we-treat/learning-disabilities-ld/dysgraphia/
Learning Disabilities & Related Disorders: Dysgraphia – Research Guides at Southern Adventist University, accessed May 13, 2025, https://southern.libguides.com/learningdisabilities/dysgraphia
Dysgraphia: An Overview – Smart Kids with Learning Disabilities, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.smartkidswithld.org/first-steps/what-are-learning-disabilities/dysgraphia-an-overview/
Information on Dysgraphia – CANadda, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.canadda.org.uk/information/dysgraphia.htm
A Beginner’s Guide to Understanding Dysgraphia — Center for …, accessed May 13, 2025, https://psychperformance.com/blog/a-beginners-guide-to-understanding-dysgraphia
Dysgraphia – Cognitive Solutions Learning Center, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.helpforld.com/what-we-treat/dysgraphia/
Defining the 3 D’s: Dyslexia, Dysgraphia, and Dyscalculia – Parallel Learning, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.parallellearning.com/post/defining-the-3-ds-dyslexia-dysgraphia-and-dyscalculia
Dyslexia, Dysgraphia, and Dyscalculia: Understanding and Accommodating the Differences, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.teachingchannel.com/k12-hub/blog/dyslexia-dysgraphia-dyscalculia-difference/
Comprehensive Learning Disorder Assessment, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.fairwindsmentalhealth.com/services/comprehensive-learning-disorder-assessment/
Dyslexia, Dyscalculia, Dysgraphia, Dyspraxia | Barnsley College, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.barnsley.ac.uk/additional-learning-support/dyslexia-dyscalculia-dysgraphia-and-dyspraxia/
Dysgraphia: Compensating Strategies for … – Mark Le Messurier, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.marklemessurier.com.au/main/articles/dcss.shtml
Dysgraphia: Signs and Support for Writing Difficulties, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.learningandliteracyclinic.com.au/dysgraphia-signs-support/
Executive Dysfunction – Cognitive Solutions Learning Center, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.helpforld.com/what-we-treat/executive-dysfunction/
5 ways you can help kids develop their executive function skills for …, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.nwea.org/blog/2025/5-ways-you-can-help-kids-develop-their-executive-function-skills-for-writing/
Discussing Dysgraphia – Amel Counseling, accessed May 13, 2025, https://ameltherapy.com/blog/2022/11/14/discussing-dysgraphia
Dyscalculia – Wikipedia, accessed May 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyscalculia
Key Characteristics of Dyscalculia: A Math Learning Disability – Magrid, accessed May 13, 2025, https://magrid.education/key-characteristics-of-dyscalculia-a-math-learning-disability/
Dyscalculia – NEURODIVERSITY Belgium, accessed May 13, 2025, https://neurodiversity.be/dyscalculia/
Dyscalculia – British Dyslexia Association, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.bdadyslexia.org.uk/dyscalculia
Dyscalculia – Minnesota Neuropsychology, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.mnneuropsychology.com/articles/dyscalculia.html
Learning disabilities: Dyscalculia | Encyclopedia on Early Childhood Development, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.child-encyclopedia.com/learning-disabilities/according-experts/dyscalculia-early-age
www.pearsonassessments.com, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.pearsonassessments.com/content/dam/school/global/clinical/us/assets/dyslexia/dyslexia-toolkit-dyscalculia.pdf
The Diagnosis and Treatment of Dyscalculia – PMC – PubMed Central, accessed May 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6440373/
Supporting Students with Disabilities | Dyscalculia, accessed May 13, 2025, https://alc.ext.unb.ca/modules/dyscalculia/implications-for-learning.html
Dyscalculia: SLD in Math – PASEN, accessed May 13, 2025, https://pasen.org/dyscalculia-sld-in-math/
What is Dyscalculia? – Harkla, accessed May 13, 2025, https://harkla.co/blogs/special-needs/dyscalculia
Clinical Practice Guidelines on Assessment and Management of …, accessed May 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6345134/
Dyscalculia: Symptoms and Causes – LD Network, accessed May 13, 2025, https://ldnetwork.org/learning-difficulty/dyscalculia-a-learning-difficulty-affecting-the-development-of-mathematical-ability/
Dyscalculia Symptoms vs. Math Anxiety: Key Differences, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.therapytrainings.com/pages/blog/dyscalculia-symptoms-vs-math-anxiety-key-differences
5 Strategies for Managing Dyscalculia – Brain Balance, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.brainbalancecenters.com/blog/strategies-for-managing-dyscalculia
Dyscalculia – Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.parentprojectmd.org/care/care-guidelines/by-area/learning-and-behavior/learning-disabilities/dyscalculia/
Dyscalculia: What It Is, Causes, Symptoms & Treatment – Cleveland Clinic, accessed May 13, 2025, https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/23949-dyscalculia
Leveraging Strengths To Overcome Weaknesses – FasterCapital, accessed May 13, 2025, https://fastercapital.com/topics/leveraging-strengths-to-overcome-weaknesses.html
Neurocognitive mechanisms of co-occurring math difficulties in dyslexia: Differences in executive function and visuospatial processing – PubMed Central, accessed May 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10918042/
Executive Function and Mathematics – Brain Balance, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.brainbalancecenters.com/blog/executive-function-mathematics
Executive Functions and Special Educational Needs and Their …, accessed May 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11592935/
Dyscalculia – National Institute for Learning Development, accessed May 13, 2025, https://nild.org/learning-disabilities/dyscalculia
What Is Dyscalculia? – Undivided, accessed May 13, 2025, https://undivided.io/resources/dyscalculia-101-1612
All about SLDs, IEPs, and IDEA – National Center for Learning Disabilities, accessed May 13, 2025, https://ncld.org/all-about-slds-ieps-and-idea/
What causes learning disabilities? – National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.nichd.nih.gov/health/topics/learning/conditioninfo/causes
Specific Learning Disabilities: The Family Physician’s Role | AAFP, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2019/1115/p628.html
What Are the Most Effective Coping Strategies for Adult Dyslexia …, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.goodrx.com/health-topic/neurological/coping-strategies-for-adult-dyslexia
Working towards a definition and guidance for Dyscalculia and Maths Difficulties – SASC, accessed May 13, 2025, https://sasc.org.uk/media/adiflafs/working-towards-a-definition-and-guidance-for-sasc-17-5-24.pdf
Common Intellectual Disabilities and Cognitive Challenges – Special …, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.specialstrong.com/common-intellectual-disabilities-and-cognitive-challenges/
What is Dyscalculia? Spot the Signs to Help Your Student …, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.connectionsacademy.com/support/resources/article/what-is-dyscalculia-help-your-student/
Learning Disorders and Disabilities | Boston Children’s Hospital, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.childrenshospital.org/conditions/learning-disorders-and-disabilities
What Happens Later? The Lifelong Impact of Learning Disorders – Brain Balance, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.brainbalancecenters.com/blog/what-happens-later-the-lifelong-impact-of-learning-disorders
The [DIS] Advantage of Studying Higher … – Arrow@TU Dublin, accessed May 13, 2025, https://arrow.tudublin.ie/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1065&context=jofis
Dyslexia in higher education – teacher’s perspective … – Frontiers, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/education/articles/10.3389/feduc.2024.1372699/full
Implications – Understanding Dysgraphia, accessed May 13, 2025, https://understandingdysgraphia.weebly.com/implications.html
Modeling Short-Term and Longitudinal Work and Educational …, accessed May 13, 2025, https://ies.ed.gov/use-work/awards/modeling-short-term-and-longitudinal-work-and-educational-transition-outcomes-adolescents-high
Dysgraphia Accommodations and Modifications | LD OnLine, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.ldonline.org/ld-topics/writing-spelling/dysgraphia-accommodations-and-modifications
A Longitudinal Investigation of Predictors and Outcomes of Specific Learning Disabilities Identification – Institute of Education Sciences (IES), accessed May 13, 2025, https://ies.ed.gov/use-work/awards/longitudinal-investigation-predictors-and-outcomes-specific-learning-disabilities-identification
Understanding Comorbidities in Learning Disabilities: A Comprehensive Guide – LDRFA, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.ldrfa.org/understanding-comorbidities-learning-disabilities/
ADHD Comorbidities: Anxiety, Depression, & More, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.adhdcentre.co.uk/anxiety-depression-learning-disabilities-what-is-adhd-comorbid-with/
Neurodevelopmental comorbidity profile in specific learning disorders – International Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.ijpediatrics.com/index.php/ijcp/article/download/246/242/963
7.4 The Role of Co-Morbidity in the Identification and Treatment of Dyslexia | CDE, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.cde.state.co.us/cdesped/dyslexia-comorbidity
Editorial: Interpreting the Comorbidity of Learning Disorders – PMC, accessed May 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8696180/
ADHD Comorbidity: Common Co-Occurring Conditions – Creyos, accessed May 13, 2025, https://creyos.com/blog/adhd-comorbidity
The Connection Between ADHD and Dysgraphia, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.monarchassessment.com/post/the-connection-between-adhd-and-dysgraphia
Beyond Reading: Psychological and Mental Health Needs in …, accessed May 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11503364/
Co-occurring disorders of learning: Why they matter for practice and research in educational neuroscience, accessed May 13, 2025, https://solportal.ibe-unesco.org/articles/co-occurring-disorders-of-learning-why-they-matter-for-practice-and-research-in-educational-neuroscience/
Personality, Behavior Characteristics, and Life Quality Impact of Children with Dyslexia, accessed May 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7068303/
Social and Emotional Problems Related to Dyslexia – JUST THE, accessed May 13, 2025, http://ma.dyslexiaida.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2016/03/Social_and_Emotion_Problems_Related_to_Dyslexia.pdf
Anxiety in youth with and without specific learning disorders: exploring the relationships with inhibitory control, perfectionism, and self-conscious emotions – Frontiers, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/article/1536192
Anxiety and Attentional Bias in Children with Specific Learning Disorders – PMC, accessed May 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6639079/
Learning Disabilities and Depression – Child Mind Institute, accessed May 13, 2025, https://childmind.org/article/learning-disabilities-and-depression/
Cognitive and neurological impairment in mood disorders – PMC, accessed May 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2570029/
Dyslexia Evaluations (Psychoeducational Assessments): Part Two …, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.parentchildpractice.com/blog/2019/1/15/dyslexia-evaluations-psychoeducational-assessments-part-two
Psychoeducational Testing for Specific Learning Disorders | Inova, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.inova.org/our-services/inova-kellar-center/programs-services/psychological/psychoeducational-testing
Psychoeducational Assessment for Learning Disabilities – Abbey Neuropsychology Clinic, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.abbeyneuropsychologyclinic.com/psychoeducational-assessment-for-learning-disabilities/
Testing | Dysgraphia Life, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.dysgraphia.life/what-is-dysgraphia/testing
Specific Developmental Disorder (SDD) | Neuropsychology Specialists LLC – Dr. Lisa Hahn, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.neuropsychologyspecialists.com/specific-developmental-disorder-of-motor-function-sdd-dysgraphia
Dyscalculia Assessment and Evaluation — Discovering Dyscalculia, accessed May 13, 2025, https://discoveringdyscalculia.com/assess
14 Dyslexia Tests Clinicians Like, accessed May 13, 2025, https://dyslexiahelp.umich.edu/professionals/learn-about-dyslexia/diagnosing-dyslexia/tests/14-dyslexia-tests-clinicians-like
Cognitive Assessment for Dyslexia Research (CAB-DX) – CogniFit, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.cognifit.com/dyslexia-test
Tests for Dyslexia and Learning Disabilities, accessed May 13, 2025, https://dyslexiahelp.umich.edu/dyslexics/learn-about-dyslexia/dyslexia-testing/tests
Dyscalculia Test (CAB-DC): Online Neuropsychological Assessment Battery. Detects risk index of the disorder. – CogniFit, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.cognifit.com/dyscalculia-test
Dysgraphia in Children: How Occupational and Speech Therapy …, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.ppt4kids.com/dysgraphia
Dysgraphia Brain Training – Abbey Neuropsychology Clinic, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.abbeyneuropsychologyclinic.com/dysgraphia-brain-training/
Dyscalculia and dyslexia in school-aged children … – Frontiers, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/education/articles/10.3389/feduc.2025.1515216/full
Teaching Adult Students with Dyslexia | First Literacy Blog, accessed May 13, 2025, https://firstliteracy.org/teaching-adult-students-with-dyslexia-the-why-who-and-how/
accessed December 31, 1969, https://dyslexiaida.org/compensatory-strategies-for-dyslexia/
accessed December 31, 1969, https://www.additudemag.com/dysgraphia-accommodations-school-work/