Table of Contents

Unveiling the Inner Workings of the Mind

1. Introduction: The Cognitive Revolution in Learning

Cognitive theories of learning mark a pivotal paradigm shift in psychological and educational thought, redirecting focus from solely observable behaviors to the intricate internal mental processes involved in acquiring, processing, storing, and retrieving information.¹ Gaining prominence in the mid-20th century, these theories emerged as a response to the perceived limitations of behaviorism, which viewed the learner’s mind as a “blank slate” primarily responding to environmental stimuli.¹ Cognitivism, by contrast, delves into the “black box” of the mind, exploring concepts such as memory, attention, perception, problem-solving, and metacognition—the awareness and understanding of one’s own thought processes.²

This shift was significantly influenced by the advent of computer technology, which provided a powerful metaphor for understanding human cognition: the mind as an information processor.⁵ Key figures like Jean Piaget, who meticulously studied the stages of cognitive development in children, and theorists who developed information-processing models, profoundly shaped this new perspective.² Cognitive theories emphasize an active approach to learning, where individuals are not passive recipients of knowledge but actively engage in breaking down, organizing, and making sense of new information.¹ This perspective underscores the learner’s role in constructing their own understanding, a departure from the more passive role often implied by behaviorist models.¹ The exploration of these internal mental mechanisms has provided a richer, more nuanced understanding of how learning occurs, with profound implications for educational practices and various other fields.

2. Historical Context and Emergence of Cognitive Theories

The rise of cognitive theories in the mid-20th century represented a significant “cognitive revolution,” challenging the dominance of behaviorism in psychology and education.¹ Behaviorism, championed by figures like John B. Watson, Ivan Pavlov, and B.F. Skinner, concentrated on observable behaviors and the role of environmental stimuli and reinforcement in learning, largely neglecting internal mental states.¹ However, by the 1950s and 1960s, researchers began to find behaviorist explanations insufficient for understanding complex human learning, particularly in areas like language acquisition and problem-solving.³

Several key figures spearheaded this shift. George A. Miller, a psychologist, highlighted the limitations of short-term memory, famously proposing the “seven plus or minus two” rule for information capacity.⁵ Ulric Neisser is often credited with coining the term “cognitive psychology” and defining its scope.³ Linguist Noam Chomsky delivered a powerful critique of B.F. Skinner’s behaviorist explanation of language acquisition as presented in his book Verbal Behavior.⁸ Chomsky argued that behaviorist principles like reinforcement and conditioning could not adequately account for the creativity, complexity, and rapid acquisition of language in children.⁸ He posited the existence of an innate “Language Acquisition Device” (LAD) and a “universal grammar,” suggesting that humans are biologically predisposed to learn language.⁸ Chomsky’s arguments about the “poverty of the stimulus”—the idea that the linguistic input children receive is too limited and imperfect to explain their rich linguistic competence—were particularly influential in undermining purely behaviorist accounts.⁸

Simultaneously, Jean Piaget’s extensive research on cognitive development in children, though initiated earlier, gained wider recognition during this period.² His stage theory detailed how children’s thinking processes change qualitatively as they mature, emphasizing the active construction of knowledge through interaction with the environment.¹⁰ The confluence of these developments, along with advancements in computer science that provided new models for thinking about mental processes, solidified cognitivism as a major force in understanding learning.⁵ This interdisciplinary approach allowed for a more comprehensive exploration of the mind, moving beyond stimulus-response associations to investigate how information is perceived, processed, stored, and utilized.

3. Core Principles and Key Concepts of Cognitivism

Cognitivism is founded on several core principles that distinguish it from earlier learning theories, primarily its emphasis on the internal mental processes that mediate between stimulus and response. These principles and their associated concepts provide a framework for understanding how individuals learn.

3.1. Focus on Internal Mental Processes

The cornerstone of cognitivism is its focus on the unobservable mental events that occur within the learner’s mind.¹ Unlike behaviorism, which concentrated on external behaviors, cognitive psychology delves into how information is acquired, processed, stored, and retrieved.² Key mental processes include:

Memory: This involves the encoding (transforming sensory input into a usable format), storage (retaining information over time), and retrieval (accessing stored information) of knowledge.¹¹ Cognitive theories explore different types of memory, such as short-term (or working) memory and long-term memory, and the mechanisms that facilitate the transfer of information between them.⁵
Attention: Defined as the ability to focus on specific stimuli while ignoring others, attention is crucial for selecting information from the environment for further processing.¹¹ Cognitive psychologists study different aspects of attention, such as selective attention (focusing on one stimulus) and divided attention (multitasking).¹¹ Effective learning hinges on the learner’s ability to direct and sustain attention on relevant information.²
Perception: This is the process by which individuals interpret and make sense of sensory information from their environment.⁴ Perception is not a passive reception of stimuli but an active process influenced by prior knowledge, expectations, and context.¹² How information is perceived significantly impacts how it is learned and understood.
Problem-Solving: Cognitive theories examine the mental strategies and processes individuals use to overcome obstacles and achieve goals.⁴ This includes understanding the problem, devising potential solutions, implementing strategies, and evaluating outcomes.¹¹
Metacognition: Often described as “thinking about thinking,” metacognition refers to an individual’s awareness and control of their own cognitive processes.⁴ It encompasses metacognitive knowledge (what one knows about one’s own cognition and learning strategies), metacognitive regulation (planning, monitoring, and evaluating one’s learning), and metacognitive experiences (reflections on learning situations).¹³ Enhanced metacognitive skills enable learners to become more strategic, self-directed, and effective.⁴

3.2. Active Knowledge Construction

Cognitivism views learners as active participants in the learning process, not passive recipients of information.¹ Individuals actively construct their own understanding by engaging with new material, relating it to prior knowledge, and organizing it in meaningful ways.² This active construction involves mental activities such as forming hypotheses, problem-solving, and discovering new information.⁴

3.3. The Role of Schemas

A crucial concept in cognitivism is the schema (plural: schemata or schemas). Schemas are mental frameworks or structures that organize and categorize knowledge and experiences in long-term memory.² They represent our understanding of concepts, objects, events, and procedures, and they guide our interpretation of new information.¹⁵ When encountering new information, learners attempt to fit it into existing schemas (assimilation) or modify existing schemas or create new ones to accommodate the new information (accommodation).¹⁰ Schemas help make information processing more efficient by providing a structure for understanding and retrieving knowledge.²

3.4. Information Processing

Many cognitive theories, particularly in the early stages of the cognitive revolution, adopted an information processing model, likening the human mind to a computer.⁵ This metaphor suggests that the mind receives input (sensory information), processes it (through attention, perception, encoding), stores it (in memory), and produces output (behavior or responses).⁵ This model helped researchers conceptualize and investigate the sequential stages and capacities involved in learning and memory.⁶

These core principles and concepts are interconnected. For instance, active knowledge construction often involves utilizing and modifying schemas, which are built through processes of attention, perception, and memory. Metacognitive skills allow learners to consciously manage these processes, leading to more effective learning. The information processing framework provides an overarching model for how these various cognitive functions might operate and interact. This holistic view of the learner as an active, thinking being fundamentally changed the landscape of educational psychology.

4. Key Cognitive Learning Theories

Building on the core principles of cognitivism, several specific theories have emerged, each offering unique insights into the mechanisms of learning and cognitive development. These theories have profoundly influenced educational practices and our understanding of the human mind.

4.1. Jean Piaget’s Theory of Cognitive Development

Jean Piaget, a Swiss psychologist, developed a comprehensive theory of cognitive development that describes how children’s thinking evolves through a series of distinct stages.⁷ He proposed that children are active learners who construct their understanding of the world through their experiences.¹⁰ His theory is characterized by four major stages:

Sensorimotor Stage (Birth to ~2 years): Infants learn primarily through their senses and motor actions.⁷ Key achievements include the development of object permanence—the understanding that objects continue to exist even when not perceived—and the beginnings of symbolic thought.¹⁰
Preoperational Stage (~2 to ~7 years): Children develop symbolic thought, enabling them to use language, engage in pretend play, and create mental images.⁷ However, their thinking is often egocentric (difficulty seeing from others’ perspectives) and lacks logical consistency.¹⁰
Concrete Operational Stage (~7 to ~11 years): Children begin to think logically about concrete events and objects.⁷ They master concepts such as conservation (understanding that quantity remains the same despite changes in appearance), reversibility, and class inclusion.¹⁰ Their reasoning, however, is still largely tied to tangible experiences.
Formal Operational Stage (~11 years through Adulthood): Adolescents and adults develop the capacity for abstract thought, hypothetical-deductive reasoning, and systematic problem-solving.⁷ They can think about possibilities, consider multiple perspectives, and engage in metacognition.¹⁰

Piaget also introduced crucial concepts to explain the mechanisms of cognitive development ¹⁰:

Schemas: Basic building blocks of intelligent behavior; organized patterns of thought or action used to interpret experiences.
Assimilation: The process of incorporating new information or experiences into existing schemas.
Accommodation: The process of modifying existing schemas or creating new ones to fit new information or experiences.
Equilibrium: A state of cognitive balance achieved when schemas can explain new experiences through assimilation. Disequilibrium occurs when new information cannot be assimilated, prompting accommodation and a move towards a new, more stable equilibrium.

Piaget’s theory underscores that cognitive development is not merely an accumulation of facts but a qualitative transformation in how individuals think and understand the world. This stage-based progression highlights the importance of developmentally appropriate learning experiences.

4.2. Information Processing Theory (IPT)

Information Processing Theory (IPT) uses the computer as a metaphor to describe how the human mind processes information.⁵ It views learning as a sequence of mental operations involving attention, perception, encoding, storage, and retrieval.⁶

4.2.1. Atkinson-Shiffrin Model of Memory

One of the most influential IPT models is the multi-store model of memory proposed by Richard Atkinson and Richard Shiffrin in 1968.⁶ This model posits three distinct memory stores ⁶:

Sensory Memory (or Sensory Register): This is the initial stage where sensory information from the environment (sights, sounds, smells, etc.) is briefly held—for up to a few seconds.⁶ Attention is critical for transferring information from sensory memory to the next stage.
Short-Term Memory (STM) / Working Memory (WM): Information attended to moves into STM, which has a limited capacity (around 5-9 items, as suggested by Miller) and a short duration (about 15-30 seconds without rehearsal).⁵ STM is not just a passive holding area but an active workspace—often referred to as working memory—where information is consciously processed, manipulated, and related to existing knowledge.⁵ Maintenance rehearsal (repetition) can keep information in STM longer, while elaborative rehearsal (linking to existing knowledge) facilitates transfer to long-term memory.
Long-Term Memory (LTM): This store is believed to have a virtually unlimited capacity and can hold information for extended periods, potentially a lifetime.⁵ LTM stores various types of information, including declarative knowledge (facts and events; subdivided into semantic and episodic memory) and procedural knowledge (skills and how to do things).⁶ Retrieval involves accessing information from LTM and bringing it back into working memory.

The Atkinson-Shiffrin model provided a foundational framework for understanding memory as a system of interconnected components, highlighting the flow of information and the processes that govern its transfer and retention.

4.2.2. Craik and Lockhart’s Levels of Processing Model

Fergus Craik and Robert Lockhart (1972) proposed the Levels of Processing model, which suggests that memory recall is a function of the depth of mental processing an item receives, rather than simply which memory store it resides in.⁶ Deeper, more meaningful processing leads to more durable memory traces.⁶ They distinguished between:

Shallow Processing: Focuses on superficial, perceptual features (e.g., the appearance or sound of a word). This often involves maintenance rehearsal and leads to weaker memory. Examples include structural processing (encoding physical qualities) and phonemic processing (encoding sound).²⁰
Deep Processing (Semantic Processing): Focuses on the meaning of information and involves relating it to existing knowledge, forming associations, or creating mental images (elaboration rehearsal).⁶ This leads to stronger, more lasting memories.

This model emphasizes that how information is encoded significantly impacts its memorability. Educational strategies that encourage learners to think deeply about material, such as summarizing in their own words or connecting concepts, are supported by this theory.²⁰

4.2.3. Baddeley and Hitch’s Model of Working Memory

Alan Baddeley and Graham Hitch (1974) refined the concept of short-term memory by proposing a more dynamic and multi-component model of Working Memory.²² Their model, later updated by Baddeley, suggests that working memory is not a single store but a system that actively holds and manipulates information during complex cognitive tasks.¹⁷ The key components include:

Central Executive: Considered the control center, it manages and coordinates the activities of the other components. It directs attention, allocates resources, and integrates information from different sources. It is involved in higher-level cognitive processes like reasoning and decision-making.²³
Phonological Loop: Deals with auditory and verbal information. It consists of two sub-components: the phonological store (which holds speech-based information briefly) and the articulatory rehearsal process (which allows for subvocal repetition to maintain information).²² It is crucial for language comprehension and acquisition.
Visuospatial Sketchpad: Manages visual and spatial information. It is responsible for creating and manipulating mental images and is involved in tasks like spatial navigation and visual problem-solving.²²
Episodic Buffer (added later): This component acts as a temporary, limited-capacity store that can integrate information from the phonological loop, visuospatial sketchpad, and long-term memory into a coherent, multi-modal representation or “episode”.¹⁷ It helps to link information across domains and create a unified conscious experience.

Baddeley and Hitch’s model provides a more nuanced understanding of how we temporarily hold and work with information, which is fundamental to learning, comprehension, and reasoning.

4.3. Cognitive Load Theory (CLT)

Developed by John Sweller in the late 1980s, Cognitive Load Theory (CLT) focuses on the limitations of working memory during instruction.²⁵ It posits that instructional design should aim to manage the cognitive load imposed on learners to optimize learning.²⁷ CLT identifies three types of cognitive load:

Intrinsic Cognitive Load: This is the inherent difficulty or complexity of the learning material itself, determined by the number of elements that must be processed simultaneously in working memory and their interactivity.²⁵ While intrinsic load cannot be eliminated, it can sometimes be managed by breaking down complex tasks into smaller, more manageable parts.²⁸
Extraneous Cognitive Load: This is an unproductive load imposed by the way information is presented or by instructional activities that do not directly contribute to learning.²⁵ Poorly designed instructional materials, confusing layouts, or irrelevant information can increase extraneous load, hindering learning by consuming valuable working memory resources.²⁶ Instructional design should aim to minimize extraneous load.⁵
Germane Cognitive Load: This is a productive load that results from the learner’s effort to process and understand the material, construct schemas, and engage in deep learning.²⁵ It involves the cognitive resources dedicated to schema acquisition and automation.²⁹ Effective instruction seeks to optimize germane load by encouraging learners to engage in activities that promote understanding and knowledge construction.²⁶

CLT suggests that if the total cognitive load (intrinsic + extraneous + germane) exceeds working memory capacity, learning will be impaired.²⁶ Therefore, instructional designers should strive to reduce extraneous load and manage intrinsic load to free up working memory resources for germane load, which is essential for meaningful learning and schema development.⁵ Applications of CLT include using worked examples, integrating visual and verbal information effectively, and reducing redundancy in instructional materials.²⁷

4.4. Jerome Bruner’s Contributions

Jerome Bruner, an influential psychologist, made significant contributions to cognitive learning theories, emphasizing active learning and the importance of structuring knowledge for understanding.⁴

Discovery Learning: Bruner advocated for discovery learning, where learners construct their own knowledge by actively exploring, experimenting, and figuring things out for themselves, rather than being passively told information.³¹ The teacher’s role is to facilitate this process by providing appropriate materials and guidance.³¹
Three Modes of Representation: Bruner proposed that learners represent knowledge in three ways, which develop sequentially but can also co-exist ⁴:

Enactive Mode (Action-based): Learning through direct experience and physical action (e.g., learning to ride a bicycle by doing it).³² This is dominant in early childhood.
Iconic Mode (Image-based): Learning through the use of images, diagrams, and other visual aids (e.g., understanding a concept through a picture).³² This becomes more prominent as children develop.
Symbolic Mode (Language-based): Learning through abstract symbols, such as language and mathematical notation (e.g., understanding a concept through a verbal explanation or a formula).³² This is the most advanced mode. Bruner suggested that instruction should ideally progress through these modes to facilitate understanding.³¹

Spiral Curriculum: Bruner introduced the concept of the spiral curriculum, where complex topics are first introduced in a simplified form and then revisited at increasing levels of complexity and detail as the learner matures and gains more knowledge.³¹ This allows learners to build upon their prior understanding and develop a deeper grasp of fundamental concepts over time. He famously stated that any subject can be taught effectively in some intellectually honest form to any child at any stage of development.³¹

Bruner’s work highlights the active role of the learner, the importance of structuring knowledge in ways that are accessible and meaningful, and the idea that learning is an ongoing process of building and refining understanding. These key theories, from Piaget’s developmental stages to Sweller’s cognitive load management, collectively illustrate the depth and breadth of cognitive approaches to learning, emphasizing the mind’s active role in constructing meaning and knowledge.

5. Evolution and Contemporary Perspectives

Cognitive theories of learning have not remained static; they have continued to evolve, incorporating new research findings and branching into various sub-perspectives. Contemporary views often integrate insights from earlier cognitive theories with advancements in fields like neuroscience and sociocultural studies.

5.1. Cognitive Constructivism

Cognitive constructivism, with roots in the work of Jean Piaget and further developed by thinkers like William Perry, emerged from a dissatisfaction with behaviorism’s neglect of internal mental processes.¹⁸ It posits that knowledge is not passively received from the environment but is actively constructed by learners based on their existing cognitive structures and experiences.⁵

Active Construction of Meaning: Learners interpret new information and experiences in light of their prior knowledge, cognitive developmental stage, cultural background, and personal history.¹⁸ This means that each learner may construct a unique understanding of the same information.
Role of Prior Knowledge: Existing cognitive structures (schemas) are central to the learning process. New information is assimilated into these structures, or the structures themselves are accommodated to incorporate new understanding.¹⁸
Learning as Discovery: The role of the instructor shifts from being a transmitter of knowledge to a facilitator of discovery, providing resources and guidance as learners attempt to make sense of new material.¹⁸ Teachers must consider the learner’s current understanding when designing curriculum and presenting information.¹⁸
Intrinsic Motivation: Unlike behaviorism, which emphasizes extrinsic motivators (rewards and punishments), cognitive constructivism views motivation as largely intrinsic.¹⁸ Successful learning, which involves significant restructuring of existing cognitive frameworks, requires a personal investment and internal drive from the learner.¹⁸

Cognitive constructivism emphasizes that learning is a deeply personal and active process of meaning-making, relative to the individual’s stage of cognitive development and existing intellectual framework.¹⁸

5.2. Sociocultural Theory (Lev Vygotsky)

Lev Vygotsky, a Russian psychologist, offered a sociocultural perspective on cognitive development that, while sharing some common ground with cognitivism (e.g., focus on mental processes), places a strong emphasis on the role of social interaction, culture, and language.³⁴

Social Interaction as the Basis of Learning: Vygotsky argued that human learning is largely a social process, and cognitive functions are formed based on interactions with others.³⁴ Higher mental functions first appear on a social level (interpsychological) and then on an individual level (intrapsychological) as they are internalized.³⁶
More Knowledgeable Other (MKO): Learning occurs through interaction with individuals who possess more knowledge or skill than the learner, such as parents, teachers, peers, or even cultural tools.³⁴
Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD): This is a core concept in Vygotsky’s theory, defined as the distance between what a learner can achieve independently and what they can achieve with guidance and collaboration from an MKO.³⁴ Learning is most effective when it occurs within this zone, challenging the learner while providing necessary support (often referred to as scaffolding).³⁶
Role of Culture and Language: Vygotsky contended that culture provides “tools of intellectual adaptation” (e.g., language, counting systems, memory strategies) that allow children to use their basic mental functions in culturally adaptive ways.³⁵ Language, in particular, plays a critical role not only in social communication but also as a tool for thought, transforming from social speech to private speech (self-talk) and then to inner speech (internalized thought).³⁶

Vygotsky’s theory contrasts with more individual-focused cognitive theories like Piaget’s by highlighting that cognitive development is not solely an internal, universal process but is deeply embedded in and shaped by social and cultural contexts.³⁵ This perspective has significant implications for collaborative learning and culturally responsive teaching practices.

5.3. Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning

The field of cognitive neuroscience seeks to understand the neural mechanisms underlying cognitive processes, including learning and memory.³⁷ It bridges the gap between cognitive theories (which describe mental functions) and the biological workings of the brain.³⁷

Methodologies: Cognitive neuroscientists employ various techniques to study brain activity during learning tasks:

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): Measures brain activity by detecting changes in blood oxygenation levels. It offers good spatial resolution, helping to identify brain regions involved in specific cognitive tasks.³⁹ For example, fMRI studies have illuminated the roles of the prefrontal cortex in working memory and the hippocampus in declarative memory formation.³⁸
Electroencephalography (EEG): Records electrical activity in the brain via scalp electrodes. It has high temporal resolution, allowing researchers to track the timing of neural events with millisecond precision.³⁹ EEG is valuable for studying dynamic cognitive processes and has been used to identify brainwave patterns associated with attention, working memory, and sleep-dependent memory consolidation.⁴⁰
Simultaneous EEG-fMRI: Combining these techniques leverages the spatial strengths of fMRI and the temporal strengths of EEG to provide a more comprehensive understanding of brain function during cognitive tasks.³⁹
Key Findings and Contributions:

Cognitive neuroscience research has provided empirical support for many concepts from cognitive learning theories, such as the distinction between different memory systems (e.g., working memory, declarative memory, procedural memory) and their neural correlates.³⁸
Studies have investigated the neural processes involved in attention, perception, language, decision-making, and problem-solving, offering insights into how these functions support learning.³⁷
Research on neuroplasticity demonstrates how learning experiences can lead to structural and functional changes in the brain, reinforcing the idea that the brain is adaptable and shaped by learning.
Findings from cognitive neuroscience are increasingly being considered in the development of educational interventions and learning technologies, aiming to create “brain-compatible” learning environments.⁴³ For instance, understanding how sleep contributes to memory consolidation has implications for study habits and schedules.³⁸

The integration of cognitive theories with neuroscientific evidence provides a more complete picture of how learning occurs, from the functional level of mental processes to the underlying neural substrates. This synergy allows for the refinement of existing learning theories and the development of new, more biologically plausible models of cognition. The ongoing dialogue between cognitive science and neuroscience promises to further deepen our understanding of the complexities of the human mind and how it learns.

6. Applications of Cognitive Theories

The principles and models derived from cognitive theories of learning have found widespread application in numerous fields, significantly influencing practices in education, therapy, technology development, and more. By focusing on internal mental processes, these theories offer practical strategies for enhancing learning, improving mental health, and designing more effective human-computer interactions.

6.1. Education and Instructional Design

Cognitive theories have revolutionized educational practices by shifting the focus from rote memorization to meaningful learning, understanding, and the development of problem-solving skills.¹⁵ Key applications include:

Schema Development: Instructional strategies aim to help learners build and refine schemas by organizing content logically, activating prior knowledge, using advance organizers (e.g., outlines or concept maps provided before instruction), and encouraging elaboration (connecting new information to existing knowledge and personal experiences).¹⁵
Managing Cognitive Load: Based on Cognitive Load Theory, instructional designers strive to minimize extraneous cognitive load (e.g., by presenting information clearly and avoiding distractions) and optimize germane cognitive load (e.g., by encouraging deep processing).⁵ This involves techniques like:

Chunking: Breaking down large amounts of information into smaller, manageable units to reduce the load on working memory.¹⁵ This can be achieved by organizing content into modules, using headings and subheadings, and highlighting key information.¹⁵
Rehearsal: Incorporating opportunities for learners to repeat and practice key concepts (maintenance rehearsal) and to connect new information with existing knowledge (elaborative rehearsal) to facilitate transfer to long-term memory.¹⁵ Spaced repetition and summarization are effective rehearsal strategies.¹⁵

Mnemonic Strategies: Teaching and incorporating memory aids (e.g., acronyms, acrostics, rhymes, visual imagery) to help learners encode, store, and retrieve information more effectively.¹⁵
Scaffolding: Providing temporary support (e.g., prompts, cues, partial solutions) to learners as they tackle complex tasks, gradually withdrawing this support as they gain competence. This concept, rooted in the work of Bruner and Vygotsky, helps learners navigate their Zone of Proximal Development.³⁰
Active Learning Strategies: Encouraging learners to actively engage with the material through discussions, problem-solving activities, inquiry-based learning, and discovery learning, as advocated by Bruner.¹
Bloom’s Taxonomy: This hierarchical classification of learning objectives, ranging from basic recall (Remembering) to higher-order thinking skills (Analyzing, Evaluating, Creating), is widely used to design curriculum, instructional activities, and assessments that promote deeper cognitive engagement.³⁰
Metacognitive Strategy Instruction: Teaching students how to plan, monitor, and evaluate their own learning processes to become more self-regulated learners.⁴

These applications aim to create learner-centered environments that foster not just knowledge acquisition but also the development of critical thinking, problem-solving abilities, and a deeper understanding of subject matter.

6.2. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)

Cognitive theories form the bedrock of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), a highly effective form of psychotherapy for a wide range of mental health conditions, including depression, anxiety disorders, and PTSD.⁴⁴ CBT is based on the cognitive model, which posits that thoughts, feelings, and behaviors are interconnected, and that psychological distress often stems from dysfunctional or unhelpful thinking patterns.¹²

Role of Schemas and Core Beliefs: CBT emphasizes the role of schemas or core beliefs—fundamental assumptions about oneself, others, and the world (e.g., “I am unlovable,” “The world is dangerous”).¹² These schemas, often developed from early life experiences, influence how individuals perceive and interpret events.⁴⁶ Maladaptive schemas can lead to biased information processing and negative automatic thoughts.
Automatic Thoughts: These are spontaneous thoughts, images, or ideas that pop into our minds in response to situations.⁴⁴ In individuals with psychological distress, these thoughts are often negative, distorted, and contribute to unpleasant emotions and unhelpful behaviors.
Cognitive Distortions: CBT identifies common errors in thinking or “cognitive distortions” (e.g., overgeneralization, catastrophizing, emotional reasoning) that maintain negative thought patterns.⁴⁵
Information Processing: CBT operates on an information processing model where individuals actively interpret their experiences.¹² Therapy aims to help individuals become aware of their automatic thoughts, identify the cognitive distortions at play, and evaluate the validity of these thoughts against evidence. By challenging and restructuring maladaptive thought patterns and underlying beliefs, individuals can change how they feel and behave.⁴⁴ Techniques include thought records, behavioral experiments, and developing more balanced and realistic perspectives.

The application of cognitive principles allows therapists to help clients understand how their interpretations of events, rather than the events themselves, drive their emotional and behavioral responses.

6.3. Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Cognitive theories, particularly those related to knowledge representation and problem-solving, have significantly influenced the development of Artificial Intelligence.¹¹ AI aims to create systems that can perform tasks typically requiring human intelligence, such as learning, reasoning, and decision-making.

Knowledge Representation (KR): This is a core area in AI that deals with how information about the world is encoded into formats that AI systems can utilize to solve complex tasks.⁴⁷ Concepts from cognitive psychology, such as schemas and mental models, inform how AI researchers design ways for machines to organize, store, and access knowledge.¹⁶ Methods include:

Logic-Based Systems: Using formal rules and propositions (e.g., “IF condition THEN conclusion”) to model knowledge.⁴⁷
Structured Representations: Organizing knowledge hierarchically or through networks (e.g., semantic networks, frames) that mimic how humans categorize information.⁴⁷ Schemas in cognitive theory, with slots for related information, find parallels in AI frame-based systems.¹⁶
Probabilistic Models: Using Bayesian networks or Markov Decision Processes to handle uncertainty and make decisions based on probabilities.⁴⁷
Distributed Representations: Modern AI often uses neural networks to encode knowledge as numerical vectors (embeddings) that capture latent patterns in data, reflecting a more connectionist approach to cognition.⁴⁷
Problem-Solving and Reasoning: AI systems employ various reasoning techniques (deductive, inductive, abductive, heuristic) to manipulate knowledge and solve problems, drawing inspiration from human cognitive processes.⁴⁸ Cognitive architectures like ACT-R and Soar attempt to model human cognition more comprehensively, integrating aspects of perception, memory, and decision-making.⁴⁹

The synergy between cognitive science and AI is bidirectional: cognitive theories provide models for AI development, and AI systems, in turn, can serve as platforms for testing and refining theories about human cognition.

6.4. Human-Computer Interaction (HCI)

Principles from cognitive psychology are fundamental to Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), which focuses on designing interfaces that are efficient, effective, and satisfying for users.⁵⁰ Understanding how users perceive, attend to, learn, remember, and solve problems is crucial for creating user-centered designs.

Mental Models: Users develop mental models of how interactive systems work. HCI designers strive to create interfaces that align with users’ existing mental models or help them develop accurate new ones, making systems more intuitive and predictable.⁴⁹
Attention: Designers use principles of visual hierarchy, minimizing clutter, and providing clear feedback to guide user attention to important information and actions, preventing cognitive overload.⁵⁰
Memory: To reduce cognitive load, interfaces are designed to rely on recognition rather than recall (e.g., providing menus and icons instead of requiring users to remember commands).⁵⁰ Consistency in design and chunking of information also aid memorability and ease of use.
Problem-Solving and Decision-Making: Interfaces should support users in achieving their goals by providing clear navigation, intuitive controls, effective error prevention, and helpful feedback when errors occur.⁵⁰ Understanding users’ problem-solving strategies helps in designing workflows that are logical and efficient.
Perception: Visual design principles (e.g., use of color, typography, layout) are based on an understanding of human perception to ensure that information is easily discernible and aesthetically pleasing.

By applying cognitive principles, HCI aims to make technology more usable and accessible, reducing frustration and enhancing productivity. The integration of cognitive insights into these diverse fields demonstrates the broad utility and enduring relevance of understanding the internal mental processes involved in learning and cognition.

7. Strengths of Cognitive Learning Theories

Cognitive learning theories have brought forth numerous strengths that have significantly advanced our understanding of how learning occurs and how it can be facilitated. Their focus on internal mental processes has provided a more nuanced and comprehensive view of the learner compared to earlier behaviorist models.

Emphasis on Understanding and Meaningful Learning: A primary strength is the shift from rote memorization to a focus on understanding, comprehension, and the meaningful acquisition of knowledge.⁵¹ Cognitive theories emphasize that learners actively construct meaning by relating new information to their existing knowledge structures (schemas), leading to deeper and more durable learning.² This approach promotes the ability to apply knowledge in new contexts rather than simply recalling isolated facts.
Promotion of Active Learning and Engagement: Cognitivism views learners as active participants in the learning process, not passive recipients of information.¹ This emphasis on active engagement encourages instructional strategies that involve learners in problem-solving, critical thinking, discovery, and discussion.⁴ Such active involvement is believed to enhance motivation, comprehension, and retention.¹
Development of Problem-Solving Skills: Cognitive theories explicitly address the mental processes involved in problem-solving, such as understanding the problem, devising strategies, and evaluating solutions.⁴ This focus has led to educational approaches that aim to cultivate these skills, enabling learners to tackle complex challenges more effectively both in academic and real-world settings.⁵¹
Cultivation of Metacognitive Abilities: The concept of metacognition—thinking about one’s own thinking—is a significant contribution of cognitive theories.⁴ By fostering metacognitive awareness and regulation, learners can become more strategic, self-directed, and efficient in their learning.⁴ They learn to plan their learning, monitor their understanding, and adjust their strategies as needed, leading to improved academic performance and lifelong learning skills.¹⁴
Provides a More Comprehensive Model of Learning: By exploring internal mental processes like memory, attention, perception, and schema formation, cognitive theories offer a more complete and complex picture of learning than behaviorism, which largely ignored these internal states.¹ This allows for a better understanding of individual differences in learning and the factors that can influence learning outcomes.
Practical Applications in Diverse Fields: The principles of cognitive learning have proven highly applicable not only in education and instructional design but also in fields such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), artificial intelligence (AI), and human-computer interaction (HCI).¹¹ This broad utility underscores the robustness and relevance of cognitive frameworks in understanding and influencing human thought and behavior. For example, strategies derived from cognitive load theory help in designing more effective training materials in corporate settings ²⁵, and understanding cognitive biases informs therapeutic interventions in CBT.⁴⁵
Supports Faster and Lifelong Learning: By teaching learners how to learn more effectively—through better information processing, organization of knowledge, and metacognitive strategies—cognitive approaches can support faster learning and equip individuals with the skills for continuous, lifelong learning.⁵¹ Learners become more confident in their ability to acquire new knowledge and adapt to new challenges.⁵¹
Encourages Abstract Thinking and Creativity: By focusing on understanding underlying principles and relationships rather than just surface features, cognitive learning promotes abstract thinking.⁵¹ When learners understand concepts deeply, they are better able to see connections, think creatively, and innovate.⁵¹

These strengths highlight the profound impact of cognitive theories on how we conceptualize learning. By delving into the mind of the learner, cognitivism has provided valuable insights and practical tools for fostering more effective, meaningful, and self-directed learning experiences.

8. Limitations and Criticisms of Cognitive Learning Theories

Despite their significant contributions, cognitive learning theories are not without limitations and have faced criticisms from various perspectives. These critiques often point to the inherent difficulty of studying internal mental processes, potential oversimplifications, and areas where the theories may not fully capture the complexity of human learning.

8.1. General Criticisms of Cognitivism

Unobservability of Mental Processes: A primary criticism is that cognitive processes (e.g., thoughts, schemas, attention) are not directly observable.⁵³ Researchers must infer these internal states from observable behavior, which can lead to subjectivity and challenges in empirical verification.⁵³ This reliance on inference can make it difficult to definitively prove that a particular cognitive process is responsible for an observed behavior.⁵⁴
Reductionism and Neglect of Other Factors: Cognitive theories have been accused of reductionism, particularly in their early forms, by focusing heavily on cognitive processes while potentially downplaying the influence of emotional, social, motivational, and biological factors on learning and behavior.⁵³ While some cognitive models acknowledge these factors, the primary emphasis often remains on information processing aspects. For instance, the computer analogy, while useful, does not account for the impact of emotions or motivations on human learning, which are significant influences.⁶
Oversimplification through the Computer Analogy: The information processing model, which likens the human mind to a computer, has been criticized for being an oversimplification.⁶ The brain is far more complex and flexible than any computer, capable of extensive parallel processing, and influenced by a multitude of biological and experiential factors not present in computational systems.⁵⁴ While the analogy helped to re-establish mental processes as a legitimate area of scientific research, its limitations are widely acknowledged.¹⁷
Lack of Ecological Validity in Research: Much of the research supporting cognitive theories, especially early information processing models, was conducted in controlled laboratory settings.⁵⁴ Critics argue that these artificial environments may lack ecological validity, meaning the findings might not generalize well to real-world learning situations where context, motivation, and social interactions play significant roles.⁵⁴

8.2. Criticisms of Specific Cognitive Theories

Information Processing Models:

Assumption of Serial Processing: Many early IPT models assumed serial processing (one step completed before the next begins), whereas humans are capable of extensive parallel processing (multiple processes occurring simultaneously).⁵⁵ While later models have incorporated parallel processing, this was an initial limitation.
Isolated Study of Processes: Cognitive functions like attention and memory were often studied in isolation, whereas in reality, they operate as an interdependent system.⁵⁷ This can limit the understanding of how cognition functions holistically in everyday life.
Piaget’s Theory of Cognitive Development:

Underestimation of Children’s Abilities: Research has suggested that Piaget may have underestimated the cognitive abilities of younger children, with some capabilities appearing earlier than his stages predicted.⁵⁸ For example, theory of mind research indicates that young children have a more sophisticated understanding of mental processes than Piaget initially proposed.⁵⁸
Methodological Issues: Piaget’s research methods, often involving small, unrepresentative samples (including his own children) and lacking detailed statistical analysis or clear operational definitions, have been criticized, making replication challenging.⁵⁸
Universality and Inflexibility of Stages: The idea of universal, discrete stages has been questioned, as development can vary significantly across individuals and cultures, and may not always follow a smooth, predictable path.³⁵ Some individuals may not reach the formal operational stage, or may demonstrate characteristics of different stages simultaneously.
Cognitive Load Theory: While highly influential in instructional design, some critics argue that it can be challenging to precisely measure the different types of cognitive load (intrinsic, extraneous, germane) in practice. Furthermore, the “expertise reversal effect” (where strategies helpful for novices become detrimental for experts) indicates that CLT principles need careful adaptation based on learner characteristics.²⁶

8.3. Academic Criticisms from Other Perspectives

Behaviorist Perspective: Behaviorists criticize cognitive theories for their focus on unobservable mental constructs.⁵⁹ From a strict behaviorist viewpoint, scientific psychology should only study observable behaviors and their environmental determinants. The introduction of internal mental states is seen as a return to unscientific introspection.⁵⁹ Textbooks have also been criticized for mischaracterizing behaviorism or presenting only its most extreme positions when contrasting it with cognitivism.⁵⁹
Constructivist Perspective (Radical Constructivism): While cognitive constructivism is a branch of cognitivism, more radical constructivist viewpoints might argue that some information processing models still portray learning as too mechanistic or universal, not fully capturing the unique, subjective meaning-making process of each individual learner.⁵ They emphasize that reality is constructed by the individual, and learning is a deeply personal interpretation of experiences. Some constructivists might find that certain cognitive theories do not adequately account for the role of social interaction and cultural context in knowledge construction, a gap addressed more directly by sociocultural theories like Vygotsky’s.⁶⁰
Connectionist (Parallel Distributed Processing – PDP) Perspective: While often considered a type of cognitive theory, connectionism offers an alternative to traditional symbolic information processing models. Connectionist models, inspired by neural networks, emphasize parallel processing and learning through the strengthening and weakening of connections between simple processing units, rather than rule-based manipulation of symbols. Some proponents might argue that symbolic AI approaches, influenced by earlier cognitive theories, are too rigid and don’t capture the flexibility and pattern recognition capabilities of the human mind as well as PDP models do.

These limitations and criticisms do not negate the profound contributions of cognitive learning theories. Instead, they highlight areas for ongoing research and refinement, pushing the field towards more comprehensive and nuanced models of human learning and cognition. The evolution of cognitive theories, including the integration of sociocultural perspectives and neuroscientific findings, reflects this continuous effort to address earlier limitations and build a more complete understanding of the mind.

9. Conclusion: The Enduring Legacy and Future of Cognitive Learning Theories

Cognitive theories of learning fundamentally reshaped our understanding of how knowledge is acquired and processed, marking a significant departure from the behaviorist focus on observable actions to an exploration of the intricate internal landscape of the human mind.¹ The mid-20th century witnessed this “cognitive revolution,” which posited learners as active information processors rather than passive recipients of environmental stimuli.¹ This paradigm shift opened the door to investigating crucial mental constructs such as memory, attention, perception, problem-solving, and metacognition, providing a richer, more detailed account of the learning process.²

The core contributions of cognitivism are manifold. Theories like Piaget’s stages of cognitive development illuminated the qualitative changes in children’s thinking as they mature, emphasizing the active construction of knowledge.¹⁰ Information Processing Theory, with its computer metaphor, provided invaluable models like the Atkinson-Shiffrin memory model and Baddeley and Hitch’s working memory model, which dissected the stages and components involved in encoding, storing, and retrieving information.⁶ Craik and Lockhart’s Levels of Processing model highlighted the critical role of deep, meaningful engagement with material for robust learning.¹⁹ Sweller’s Cognitive Load Theory offered practical guidance for instructional design by considering the finite capacity of working memory ²⁵, while Bruner’s concepts of discovery learning and modes of representation underscored the importance of active exploration and developmentally appropriate instruction.³¹

The evolution of cognitive thought has led to the emergence of cognitive constructivism, which emphasizes the learner’s unique meaning-making process ¹⁸, and the integration of sociocultural perspectives, largely influenced by Vygotsky, which highlight the critical roles of social interaction and cultural context in cognitive development.³⁴ Furthermore, the advent of cognitive neuroscience, with tools like fMRI and EEG, has begun to map these cognitive processes onto their neural substrates, offering a deeper, biologically grounded understanding of learning.³⁷

The impact of cognitive theories extends far beyond academic psychology. They have profoundly influenced educational practices, leading to learner-centered approaches, strategies for managing cognitive load, and techniques for fostering metacognition and problem-solving skills.¹⁵ In clinical settings, cognitive principles form the basis of highly effective treatments like Cognitive Behavioral Therapy.⁴⁴ Moreover, concepts from cognitive psychology have been instrumental in the development of Artificial Intelligence, particularly in areas of knowledge representation and problem-solving ⁴⁷, and in Human-Computer Interaction, guiding the design of intuitive and user-friendly interfaces.⁵⁰

Despite their strengths, cognitive theories have faced valid criticisms, including the unobservability of mental processes, potential for reductionism, and the limitations of the computer analogy.⁵³ However, these critiques have spurred further research and refinement, leading to more sophisticated and nuanced models that increasingly acknowledge the interplay of cognitive, emotional, social, and biological factors.

The enduring legacy of cognitive learning theories lies in their successful shift of focus to the internal mental world of the learner. They have provided a robust framework for understanding the complex processes involved in learning and have generated a wealth of empirically supported strategies for enhancing it. The future of cognitive learning theories will likely involve continued integration with neuroscience to further unravel the brain’s learning mechanisms, a greater emphasis on the role of context and individual differences, and the application of these principles to address the evolving challenges of education and technology in the 21st century. The journey into the “black box” of the mind is far from over, but cognitive theories have provided indispensable maps and tools for this ongoing exploration.

Works cited

Learning Theories: Five Theories of Learning in Education | NU, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.nu.edu/blog/theories-of-learning/
Understanding Cognitivism: A Learning Theory – EducaSciences, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.educasciences.org/learning-theories-cognitivism
Learning Theories: Understanding How People Learn – Instruction …, accessed May 13, 2025, https://iopn.library.illinois.edu/pressbooks/instructioninlibraries/chapter/learning-theories-understanding-how-people-learn/#:~:text=Cognitivism%2C%20or%20cognitive%20psychology%2C%20was,Codington%2DLacerte%2C%202018).
Learning Theory: Cognitivism – Niall McNulty, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.niallmcnulty.com/2020/05/learning-theory-cognitivism/
3.2 Cognitive Theories of Learning – Foundations of Educational …, accessed May 13, 2025, https://open.library.okstate.edu/foundationsofeducationaltechnology/chapter/3-cognitive-theories-of-learning/
Information Processing Theory: Definition and Examples – ThoughtCo, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.thoughtco.com/information-processing-theory-definition-and-examples-4797966
Piaget’s theory of cognitive development – Wikipedia, accessed May 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piaget%27s_theory_of_cognitive_development#:~:text=above%20their%20level.-,Four%20stages%20of%20development,stage%2C%20and%20formal%20operational%20stage.
Student Question : What are Chomsky’s criticisms of Behaviorism in the context of language acquisition? | Education Studies | QuickTakes, accessed May 13, 2025, https://quicktakes.io/learn/education-studies/questions/what-are-chomskys-criticisms-of-behaviorism-in-the-context-of-language-acquisition
Chomsky’s Theory – Structural Learning, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.structural-learning.com/post/chomskys-theory
Piaget Cognitive Stages of Development – WebMD, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.webmd.com/children/piaget-stages-of-development
What Is Cognitive Psychology and Why Is It So Important …, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.amu.apus.edu/area-of-study/arts-and-humanities/resources/what-is-cognitive-psychology-and-why-is-it-so-important/
Cognitive Theory And Associated Therapies – MentalHealth.com, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.mentalhealth.com/library/cognitive-theory-and-therapies
The 3 Types of Metacognition Explained | Schools That Lead, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.schoolsthatlead.org/blog/2025/2/25/the-3-types-of-metacognition-explained
Fostering Metacognition to Support Student Learning and Performance – PMC, accessed May 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8734377/
Implications Of Learning Theories On Instructional Design …, accessed May 13, 2025, https://elearningindustry.com/learning-theories-instructional-design-implications
Schema Theory | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/psychology/schema-theory
Information processing theory – Wikipedia, accessed May 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_processing_theory
Cognitive Constructivism | GSI Teaching & Resource Center, accessed May 13, 2025, https://gsi.berkeley.edu/gsi-guide-contents/learning-theory-research/cognitive-constructivism/
Levels Of Processing | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/social-sciences-and-humanities/levels-processing
Levels of Processing Theory (Craik & Lockhart, 1972), accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.simplypsychology.org/levelsofprocessing.html
Levels of Processing – The Decision Lab, accessed May 13, 2025, https://thedecisionlab.com/biases/levels-of-processing-effect
5.2: Components-Central Executive, Phonological Loop, Visuospatial Sketchpad, accessed May 13, 2025, https://socialsci.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Psychology/Cognitive_Psychology/Cognitive_Psychology_(Andrade_and_Walker)/05%3A_Working_Memory/5.02%3A_Components-Central_Executive_Phonological_Loop_Visuospatial_Sketchpad
Baddeley’s model of working memory – Wikipedia, accessed May 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baddeley%27s_model_of_working_memory
Working Memory Model In Psychology (Baddeley & Hitch), accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.simplypsychology.org/working%20memory.html
Enhancing Learning Through Cognitive Load Theory: Insights from John Sweller’s Experiment – Achology, accessed May 13, 2025, https://achology.com/psychology/understanding-the-cognitive-load-theory-experiment/
Cognitive Load Theory: A Teacher’s Guide – Structural Learning, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.structural-learning.com/post/cognitive-load-theory-a-teachers-guide
Cognitive Load Theory (John Sweller) – InstructionalDesign.org, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.instructionaldesign.org/theories/cognitive-load/
Cognitive load – Wikipedia, accessed May 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_load
Cognitive Load Theory: Definition, Types, And Applications For Learning, accessed May 13, 2025, https://cognitiontoday.com/cognitive-load-theory-definition-types-and-applications-for-learning-guest-post/
Understanding Theories and Models of Instructional Design, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.keiseruniversity.edu/theories-models-instructional-design/
Using Jerome Bruner’s key theories in teaching practice – Maths No Problem, accessed May 13, 2025, https://mathsnoproblem.com/blog/teaching-tips/jerome-bruner-theories-put-into-practice
Jerome Bruner Theory of Cognitive Development & Constructivism, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.simplypsychology.org/bruner.html
UNIT 16 BRUNER’S DISCOVERY APPROACH – eGyanKosh, accessed May 13, 2025, https://egyankosh.ac.in/bitstream/123456789/96071/1/Unit-16.pdf
Sociocultural Theory of Cognitive Development, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.mcw.edu/-/media/MCW/Education/Academic-Affairs/OEI/Faculty-Quick-Guides/Sociocultural-Theory-of-Cognitive-Development.pdf
Sociocultural Theory: Understanding Vygotsky’s Theory – Verywell Mind, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-sociocultural-theory-2795088
Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory Of Cognitive Development, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.simplypsychology.org/vygotsky.html
How cognitive theory guides neuroscience – PMC, accessed May 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4601572/
Cognitive neuroscience perspective on memory: overview and summary – PubMed Central, accessed May 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10410470/
(PDF) Editorial: Simultaneous EEG-fMRI applications in cognitive …, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377528318_Editorial_Simultaneous_EEG-fMRI_applications_in_cognitive_neuroscience
Advances in Neuroimaging and Deep Learning for Emotion … – MDPI, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/15/4/456
How cognitive theory guides neuroscience – PMC, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4601572/
Investigating Learning and Memory in Humans | Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Neuroscience, accessed May 13, 2025, https://oxfordre.com/neuroscience/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264086.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264086-e-406?p=emailAcYCFC4OWxooA&d=/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264086.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264086-e-406
Lighting Up The Mind: Transforming Learning Through The Applied Scholarship of Cognitive Neuroscience – Digital Commons@Georgia Southern, accessed May 13, 2025, https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1274&context=ij-sotl
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) – Psychology Tools, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.psychologytools.com/professional/therapies/cognitive-behavioral-therapy-cbt
Cognitive Behavior Therapy – StatPearls – NCBI Bookshelf, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470241/
Schema Change Processes in Cognitive Therapy – Padesky.com, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.padesky.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/schema_change_article_permissions.pdf
Knowledge Representation in AI | GeeksforGeeks, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/knowledge-representation-in-ai/
How Intelligent Agents Use Knowledge Representation for Decision-Making – SmythOS, accessed May 13, 2025, https://smythos.com/ai-agents/ai-tutorials/intelligent-agents-and-knowledge-representation/
Knowledge Representation | Cognitive Psychology Class Notes – Fiveable, accessed May 13, 2025, https://library.fiveable.me/cognitive-psychology/unit-8
What is Cognitive Psychology | IxDF, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/topics/cognitive-psychology
Cognitive Learning: Why It Is The Pioneer Learning Style? – ELM Learning, accessed May 13, 2025, https://elmlearning.com/hub/learning-theories/cognitive-learning/
Human-Computer Interaction and Artificial Intelligence: Advancing Care Through Extended Mind Theory – PMC, accessed May 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11691189/
Strengths and Weaknesses of the Cognitive Approach (with …, accessed May 13, 2025, https://getrevising.co.uk/grids/strengths_and_weaknesses_of_the_cognitive
CRITICISM OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY – APSM College, Barauni Begusarai, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.apsmcollege.ac.in/glassimg/thumb_album/1599764013-26.pdf
unacademy.com, accessed May 13, 2025, https://unacademy.com/content/cbse-class-12/study-material/psychology/information-processing-theories/#:~:text=Limitations%20of%20the%20information%20processing%20theory&text=Emotions%20or%20motivations%20do%20not,human%20mind%20can%20parallel%20processing.
Information processing theories in Psychology – Unacademy, accessed May 13, 2025, https://unacademy.com/content/cbse-class-12/study-material/psychology/information-processing-theories/
Information Processing Theory In Psychology, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.simplypsychology.org/information-processing.html
Support and Criticism of Piaget’s Stage Theory – Verywell Mind, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.verywellmind.com/support-and-criticism-of-piagets-stage-theory-2795460
Problems of Teaching the Behaviorist Perspective in the Cognitive Revolution – PMC, accessed May 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4217616/
Learning Theories: Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Constructivism, and Connectivism, accessed May 13, 2025, https://traviselearning.net/blog/2016/2/25/learning-theories-behaviorism-cognitivism-constructivism-and-connectivism

Self Sensei

Cognitive Theories of Learning